woggle wrote: > On 10/3/09 11:30 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> In 2674a and 2674b, Walker and ais523 opined REMAND, the other three >> panelists didn't opine on time. Overtime period is in progress; >> Justiciar woggle can publish a Justiciar's Opinion of REMAND, otherwise >> I'll make the panel REMAND after the overtime period ends. > > Your records seem to show that you are on of the other three panelists. > Interesting choice there.
I intended to opine REMAND in my role as a panelist, but missed getting around to it in time. > In the appeal of culpability in CFJ 2674, I hereby publish a Justiciar's > opinion of AFFIRM. This decision isn't the same as any panelist, so it doesn't cause the panel to act. (I'll treat it as gratuitous arguments, though.)
