Maud wrote:
On 6/9/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The final paragraph of rule 869. The Hanging Judge is clearly no longer
a person, according to recent jurisprudence and rule 2145.
My copy of the ruleset only has effects of proposals up to 4975.
Would you mind quoting the text you hav
On 6/9/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The final paragraph of rule 869. The Hanging Judge is clearly no longer
a person, according to recent jurisprudence and rule 2145.
My copy of the ruleset only has effects of proposals up to 4975.
Would you mind quoting the text you have in mind?
--
Michael Slone wrote:
>What grants you the power to deregister the Hanging Judge?
The final paragraph of rule 869. The Hanging Judge is clearly no longer
a person, according to recent jurisprudence and rule 2145.
-zefram
On 6/9/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby cause the Hanging Judge to be deregistered, provided that
this does not cause me to cease to be a player.
What grants you the power to deregister the Hanging Judge?
--
C. Maud Image (Michael Slone)
Agora: a self-supporting cycle of evil.
Ed Murphy wrote:
>I interpret a partnership's identity, not merely as the set of its
>members, but as the agreement defining that set.
What is your legal theory by which a partnership is a person, in that
case? The theory that I've used is based on the partnership's rights
and obligations devolvi
comex wrote:
I assign CFJs 1666-8 to The Hanging Judge. E is still turned.
Text at:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-May/006418.html
I encourage Zefram and Murphy to submit psuedojudgements.
I interpret a partnership's identity, not merely as the set of
6 matches
Mail list logo
