Gratuitous initial thoughts: "violating a pledge" isn't in itself an action to perform or refrain from performing, but the consequences of some action. You can't just "violate a rule" as an action, you do some other action which as a consequence violates a rule.
It's like saying "I pledge that the sun will rise tomorrow" which doesn't fit the definition of being (R2450) "a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or refrain from performing) certain actions". (This would be saying that "I pledge that..." followed by something that isn't such an action is an ISID, not an actual pledge, which I don't think we've considered one way or the other before?) On 5/25/2021 12:34 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > I favor this CFJ. I have some vague thoughts, but I don't actually know how > I'm going to rule yet, so arguments are quite welcome. > > -Aris > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:32 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> CFJ: I have violated one of the quoted pledges. >> >> Gaelan >> >>> On May 22, 2021, at 5:45 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business < >> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On May 22, 2021, at 5:44 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business < >> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> I pledge to violate this pledge, with a time window of one hour. >>>> >>>> (There has to be a paradox protection for pledges somewhere, right? >> Right???? But I can't find it, so let's find out) >>>> >>>> Gaelan >>> >>> wait, oops: I pledge to violate this pledge, with a time window of one >> day. >>> >>> Gaelan >> >>
