tusho wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> If the above statement is false,
>> This condition cannot be evaluated by any reasonable effort, so the
>> attempted action is invalid due to unclarity.
>>
>> -zefram
>>
>
> It can be evaluated trivially - ask me.
Al
2008/7/16 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm treating this as not communicating intent with sufficient clarity to
> be effective.
>
>
Want to ask me whether I was drinking coffee?
tusho wrote:
> I am drinking coffee.
>
> If the above statement is false, I initiate a criminal CFJ against tusho
> for violating rule 2149 by making a false statement in the message that
> initiated this CFJ.
I'm treating this as not communicating intent with sufficient clarity to
be effective.
2008/7/16 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Elliott Hird wrote:
>>If the above statement is false,
>
> This condition cannot be evaluated by any reasonable effort, so the
> attempted action is invalid due to unclarity.
>
> -zefram
>
It can be evaluated trivially - ask me.
Elliott Hird wrote:
>If the above statement is false,
This condition cannot be evaluated by any reasonable effort, so the
attempted action is invalid due to unclarity.
-zefram
5 matches
Mail list logo
