On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
comex CAN adopt a trumpet without 15 objections; its power is set to
one, and then it takes effect. It does not otherwise take effect.
Doesn't fix the problem that this text has to be taken to be a part of
a hypothetical rule (with uncertain power) for this to
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
comex CAN adopt a trumpet without 15 objections; its power is set to
one, and then it takes effect. It does not otherwise take effect.
Doesn't fix the problem that this text has to be
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
comex CAN adopt a trumpet without 15 objections; its power is set to
one, and then it takes effect. It does not otherwise take effect.
Doesn't fix the
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
comex CAN adopt a trumpet without 15 objections; its power is set to
one, and then it takes effect. It does not otherwise take effect.
Nope. The existence of power does not depend on your contract.
Therefore your contract cannot
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
comex CAN adopt a trumpet without 15 objections; its power is set to
one, and then it takes effect. It does not otherwise take effect.
Nope. The existence of power does
Taral wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
comex CAN adopt a trumpet without 15 objections; its power is set to
one, and then it takes effect. It does not otherwise take effect.
Nope. The existence of power does not depend on your contract.
Therefore your
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
It is restricted to editing entities and/or attributes whose
existences depend on it. It restricts itself to entities, therefor the
or clause is satisfied. Otherwise, contracts could not define dependent
actions modifying
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
It is restricted to editing entities and/or attributes whose
existences depend on it. It restricts itself to entities, therefor the
or clause is satisfied. Otherwise,
Taral wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
It is restricted to editing entities and/or attributes whose
existences depend on it. It restricts itself to entities, therefor the
or clause is satisfied. Otherwise, contracts could not define dependent
actions
9 matches
Mail list logo
