On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 10:13 -0500, Jacob Arduino wrote:
> Indeed I retract
You need to post the retraction to a public forum (typically agora-
business). Actions in agora-discussion don't work.
--
ais523
Indeed I retract
On Nov 27, 2018 09:48, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
You may wish to retract these CFJs: if everyone agrees you were right
(well-spotted, btw) and Gaelan has changed eir votes so the issue is
moot, no need to litigate.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Jacob Arduino wrote:
> CFJ: Gaelan's second
You may wish to retract these CFJs: if everyone agrees you were right
(well-spotted, btw) and Gaelan has changed eir votes so the issue is
moot, no need to litigate.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Jacob Arduino wrote:
> CFJ: Gaelan's second ballot on Proposal 8136 is invalid.
> Supporting statement: Rule
No, it's standard to fail second ballots when people forget to retract
their first one. That's why the last sentence of R683 defines "changing"
a vote, so voters can use that term as a shorthand - but you still have
to use it explicitly.
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Jacob Arduino wrote:
> My second CF
My second CFJ states re: 8138, not 8136. These might be too nitpicky, but
I'd rather deal with it now than see you disenfranchised for something
silly.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:26 AM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Bah, do we need to explicitly retract votes? For clarity: I retract any
> previous votes
5 matches
Mail list logo
