On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 08:42 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> > E can only do it once every thirty days. Isn't nonplayerhood for 0.99...
> > of the time enough?
>
> I was thinking of proposing that we make time time limit between
> registrations propo
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> E can only do it once every thirty days. Isn't nonplayerhood for 0.99...
> of the time enough?
I was thinking of proposing that we make time time limit between
registrations proportional to the number of times you've previously
deregistered, but si
Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/8/6 Warrigal :
>> I register.
>>
>> So, pop quiz! Which of the following three announcements, which are
>> all win announcements, is the longest of the three?
>>
>> I do.
>>
>> I am.
>>
>> My voting limit on an ordinary decision initiated at this time would
>> exceed the
coppro wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>> My voting limit on an ordinary decision initiated at this time would
>> exceed the combined voting limits of all other players on that
>> decision.
> I intend, with support, to publish an NoV accusing Warrigal of violating
> the 2-power Rule 2215 by publishing th
Warrigal wrote:
> My voting limit on an ordinary decision initiated at this time would
> exceed the combined voting limits of all other players on that
> decision.
I intend, with support, to publish an NoV accusing Warrigal of violating
the 2-power Rule 2215 by publishing the quoted paragraph.
I C
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 17:26, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:42, Warrigal wrote:
>>> I register.
>>>
>>> I deregister.
>>>
>> Problem: The Insulator, Grand Poobah, and Anarchist are all obligated
>> to deal Warrigal two cards but are unabl
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:42, Warrigal wrote:
>> I register.
>>
>> I deregister.
>>
> Problem: The Insulator, Grand Poobah, and Anarchist are all obligated
> to deal Warrigal two cards but are unable to do so because cards can
> only be created in the posse
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:42, Warrigal wrote:
> I register.
>
> I deregister.
>
Problem: The Insulator, Grand Poobah, and Anarchist are all obligated
to deal Warrigal two cards but are unable to do so because cards can
only be created in the possession of a player or contest. I assume
this is a tri
2009/8/6 Warrigal :
> I register.
>
> So, pop quiz! Which of the following three announcements, which are
> all win announcements, is the longest of the three?
>
> I do.
>
> I am.
>
> My voting limit on an ordinary decision initiated at this time would
> exceed the combined voting limits of all oth
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> In addition, the statement can only be considered "correct" in the
> local language-context scope of the message. Local definitions aren't in
> scope to affect the interpretation of Rules.
Yah, there's a similarity in meaning, but it's as non-working as the
tr
comex wrote:
> 18:02 < Warrigal> The rule requires that win announcements be correct.
> 18:02 < Warrigal> That win announcement was the correct answer to a question.
> 18:03 < Pavitra> lolll
> 18:04 < Warrigal> Obviously, if this were not an intended consequence,
> the rule would have required that
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> I register.
>
> So, pop quiz! Which of the following three announcements, which are
> all win announcements, is the longest of the three?
>
> I do.
>
> I am.
>
> My voting limit on an ordinary decision initiated at this time would
> exceed the combi
12 matches
Mail list logo
