Ed Murphy wrote:
Due to Rules 1006 and 1450, the office of CotC is currently
vacant. Or, under a different interpretation, I am being
continuously assigned by 1006 and removed by 1450, which is
no better.
R1006 says that an office that would otherwise be vacant is held by the
Speaker. This
On 5/16/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
R889 says
The Clerk of the Courts ... is an office, but in most other rules
the Clerk of the Courts is a player with certain obligations.
At least R1006:
The holder of an office may be referred to by the name of the
office.
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Due to Rules 1006 and 1450, the office of CotC is currently
vacant. Or, under a different interpretation, I am being
continuously assigned by 1006 and removed by 1450, which is
no better.
R1006 says that an office that would otherwise be vacant is held by the
Ed Murphy wrote:
Unless the Speaker cannot hold that office.
Which R1450 doesn't prevent. R1450 only triggers when the Speaker is
already CotC.
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Unless the Speaker cannot hold that office.
Which R1450 doesn't prevent. R1450 only triggers when the Speaker is
already CotC.
It depends whether you interpret mutually exclusive as a prohibition
(with the next clause amounting to if someone pushes me, I
Goethe wrote:
I can't keep up right now. Need to enforce a break in myself, otherwise
RL will suffer more (already is, can never seem to not get sucked in).
Sincere apologies for leaving the CotC office so far behind. I'll continue
to watch the (encouraging) developments with interest.
I
BobTHJ wrote:
Better to have an inexperienced CotC then none at all.
BEWARE... CotC ... office ... it ... is cough cough ACCURSED
Hmmexcellent idea. I support this.
BobTHJ
On 5/15/07, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/15/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BEWARE... CotC ... office ... it ... is cough cough ACCURSED
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Primo Corporation the holder of
the office of Clerk
comex wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Primo Corporation the holder of
the office of Clerk of the Courts.
Heh, splitting officer duties through private arrangement is what
we were trying to acheive through subcontracting a year or so ago,
now here it is, a good idea in through a
comex wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Primo Corporation the holder of
the office of Clerk of the Courts.
I object. IMO partnerships aren't stable enough to hold office yet.
On May 14, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I can't keep up right now. Need to enforce a break in myself,
otherwise
RL will suffer more (already is, can never seem to not get sucked in).
Sincere apologies for leaving the CotC office so far behind. I'll
continue
to watch the
11 matches
Mail list logo
