Re: DIS: Re: BUS: court merry go round

2010-09-13 Thread omd
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: I support.  In any event, the judge did not consider every possible reason Tiger could be a pope (including the gratuitous arguments regarding Discordian Popeiness), so a judgment of UNDETERMINED should be considered.

DIS: Re: BUS: court merry go round

2010-09-10 Thread Sean Hunt
On 09/10/2010 06:21 PM, comex wrote: As judge of CFJ 2857, I publish the following /incorrect/ judicial declarations: { G.'s position on the List of Succession is unknown. } { coppro's position on the List of Succession is unknown. } { omd's position on the List of Succession is unknown. } {

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: court merry go round

2010-09-10 Thread comexk
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: Judicial declarations are only self-ratifying if their publication is required, and these certainly were not. I'm trying to use the found by judicial declaration to be unknown or ambiguous clause,

DIS: Re: BUS: court merry go round

2010-09-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote: I submit the following Urgent Proposal, titled The List of No Doubt, AI = 2, II = 1: {In Rule 2314, replace eir position on the list is found by judicial declaration to be unknown or ambiguous with eir position on the list has been found to be unknown or