On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 09:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ah - that's plausible. On the other hand, I'm thinking that if you could
> ratify the ossification statement and thus flip a switch, you could also
> perform a direct ratification of that switch without mentioning
>
On 8/18/2022 7:50 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 07:38 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 8/18/2022 7:33 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 07:26 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
On 8/18/2022 3:18
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 07:38 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/18/2022 7:33 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 07:26 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On 8/18/2022 3:18 AM, Madrid via agora-business wrote:
> > > > I intend to
On 8/18/2022 7:33 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 07:26 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 8/18/2022 3:18 AM, Madrid via agora-business wrote:
>>> I intend to ratify without objection the following: "Agora is not ossified."
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> If
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 07:26 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/18/2022 3:18 AM, Madrid via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to ratify without objection the following: "Agora is not ossified."
>
> [snip]
>
> If such a statement is ratified when it *doesn't* match the
On 8/18/2022 3:18 AM, Madrid via agora-business wrote:
> I intend to ratify without objection the following: "Agora is not ossified."
So this is sorta instructive in terms of the behavior of switches versus
attributes.
Ossification as per 1698 is a continuously-evaluated condition encoded in
6 matches
Mail list logo
