> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:27 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On 6/30/20 10:26 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> > > I object to all and any intents to exile nch.
> > >
> > > I withdraw these objections.
> > >
> >
> > I object to all and any intents to exile
In my email client, I beat you by 1 minute.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:27 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/30/20 10:26 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> > I object to all and any intents to exile nch.
> >
> > I withdraw these objections.
> >
>
> I object to
2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
--
C-walker, who intends, without objection
Having received no objections, I do so.
--
C-walker
It was not to the public forum.
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
--
C-walker, who intends, without objection
Having received no objections, I do so.
--
C-walker
It was not to the public forum.
I
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
--
C-walker, who intends, without objection
Having
Craig Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
--
C-walker, who intends, without
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
The intent was for the same action (null string) both times. The
ambiguity shouldn't invalidate the action any more than the ambiguity of
attempting to transfer an unspecified one of several mutually-fungible
Craig Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
The intent was for the same action (null string) both times. The
ambiguity shouldn't invalidate the action any more than the ambiguity of
attempting to transfer an unspecified one of
8 matches
Mail list logo