Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Objections

2020-07-01 Thread James Cook via agora-discussion
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:27 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > On 6/30/20 10:26 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > > I object to all and any intents to exile nch. > > > > > > I withdraw these objections. > > > > > > > I object to all and any intents to exile

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Objections

2020-06-30 Thread Becca Lee via agora-discussion
In my email client, I beat you by 1 minute. On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:27 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 6/30/20 10:26 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > I object to all and any intents to exile nch. > > > > I withdraw these objections. > > > > I object to

DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

2009-06-18 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: -- C-walker, who intends, without objection Having received no objections, I do so. -- C-walker It was not to the public forum.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

2009-06-18 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Elliott Hird wrote: 2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: -- C-walker, who intends, without objection Having received no objections, I do so. -- C-walker It was not to the public forum. I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

2009-06-18 Thread Craig Daniel
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: Elliott Hird wrote: 2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: -- C-walker, who intends, without objection Having

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

2009-06-18 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Craig Daniel wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: Elliott Hird wrote: 2009/6/18 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 2:21 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: -- C-walker, who intends, without

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

2009-06-18 Thread Craig Daniel
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: The intent was for the same action (null string) both times. The ambiguity shouldn't invalidate the action any more than the ambiguity of attempting to transfer an unspecified one of several mutually-fungible

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: no objections

2009-06-18 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Craig Daniel wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: The intent was for the same action (null string) both times. The ambiguity shouldn't invalidate the action any more than the ambiguity of attempting to transfer an unspecified one of