Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-10 Thread Zefram
Benjamin Schultz wrote: >Second draft. Looks fine to me. -zefram

DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
OscarMeyr wrote: >i. All players have the obligation to abide by all the rules >currently in effect, in the form in which they are currently >in effect. The whole point of re-writing R101 to talk about contract law was so that Agoran Rules could be treated as a specific case

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-10 Thread Benjamin Schultz
Second draft. Proto: The Obedience Clause (AI = 3) On May 8, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: Amend Rule 101 as follows: * Retitle it to "Agoran Rights, Privileges, and Obligations". * Increment the lower-case Roman numerals used to index paragraphs by 1. * insert before the new par

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-09 Thread Zefram
Benjamin Schultz wrote: >The most recent phrasing was "All players must abide by the >rules" I can bring that phrasing back, if desirable. Or I can >use "obligation." I prefer the word "obligation". "Must" has too many meanings. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-09 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On May 9, 2007, at 3:25 AM, Zefram wrote: I'll include the suggested fixes in the next draft. i. All players have the responsibility to abide by all the rules currently in effect, in the form in which they are currently in effect. This raises much the same questions as Suber's

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-09 Thread Zefram
Benjamin Schultz wrote: >Retitle the rule "Agoran Rights, Privileges, and Responsibilities." Be more explicit about which rule. This can be read as referring to an existing rule by title, commanding that it be retitled, but not saying what the new title is. Also put the "." outside the quotes un

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-08 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On May 7, 2007, at 9:36 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: Oh wait -- R101 no longer says that we must obey the rules! Never mind Here's a proto to put that back in. Proto: The Obedience Clause (AI=4) Change the power of R101 to 4. Retitle the rule "Agoran Rights, Privileges, and Responsib

DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: precedence takes precedence

2007-05-07 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On May 7, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Zefram wrote: I hereby submit the following proposal, titled "precedence takes precedence", and set its AI to 4: {{{ Change the Power of rule 1482 to 4. [At Power=3, R1482 doesn't work properly in the Power>=3 region, because a Power=3 rule can take precedence o