On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
According to the Assessor DB, I gained a Rest on September 1 at
12:41:16 UTC. Did that one get destroyed? Otherwise, the DB
matches the above.
I don't think you actually gained a Rest at that time. That's when you
were
Wooble wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
According to the Assessor DB, I gained a Rest on September 1 at
12:41:16 UTC. Did that one get destroyed? Otherwise, the DB
matches the above.
I don't think you actually gained a Rest at that time.
BobTHJ wrote:
Remove the last sentence of R1504 (destroying rests from appealed
judgements, no longer necessary)
I have a proposal floating around somewhere that would move
appeals of criminal cases into a separate rule. If that passes
first, then this would break something else in R1504
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 23:47, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I repeat the following action 24 times:
- I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
due to CFJ 2674).
As allowed by
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I repeat the following action 24 times:
- I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
due to CFJ 2674).
Well, that was fun.
BobTHJ
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I repeat the following action 24 times:
- I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
due to CFJ 2674).
As allowed by R1504 I destroy the above 24 rests. Then I destroy 2
more rests in my
6 matches
Mail list logo
