Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> According to the Assessor DB, I gained a Rest on September 1 at
>> 12:41:16 UTC. Did that one get destroyed? Otherwise, the DB
>> matches the above.
>
> I don't think you actually gained a Rest at that time. That's when you
>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> According to the Assessor DB, I gained a Rest on September 1 at
> 12:41:16 UTC. Did that one get destroyed? Otherwise, the DB
> matches the above.
I don't think you actually gained a Rest at that time. That's when you
were sentenced to SILENCE
Wooble wrote:
> I deputize for the Herald to publish the following, which is part of
> eir Weekly Report:
> {{
> Rest Report:
>
> Player Rests
> -- -
> coppro 23
> Murphy 1
> Tanner L. Swett18
> 0
>
> }}
According to the Assessor DB
BobTHJ wrote:
> Remove the last sentence of R1504 (destroying rests from appealed
> judgements, no longer necessary)
I have a proposal floating around somewhere that would move
appeals of criminal cases into a separate rule. If that passes
first, then this would break something else in R1504 (al
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 23:47, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex wrote:
>>>
>>> I repeat the following action 24 times:
>>> - I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
>>> due to CFJ 2674).
>>>
>> As allowed by R1504 I destro
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex wrote:
I repeat the following action 24 times:
- I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
due to CFJ 2674).
As allowed by R1504 I destroy the above 24 rests. Then I destroy 2
more rests in my possession.
This
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex wrote:
> I repeat the following action 24 times:
> - I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
> due to CFJ 2674).
>
Well, that was fun.
BobTHJ
7 matches
Mail list logo
