ehird wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2009, at 17:27, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> Gratuituous: You could have asked comex to agree to amend Bayes to
>> let
>> it perform its duties under manual control during server outages.
>
> We already can, but SHOULD NOT.
IMO a server outage is sufficient grounds to overr
On 26 Jan 2009, at 17:27, Ed Murphy wrote:
Gratuituous: You could have asked comex to agree to amend Bayes to
let
it perform its duties under manual control during server outages.
We already can, but SHOULD NOT.
ehird wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2009, at 07:14, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> Parties of Bayes, I inform you of this equity case (2351) and invite
>> you to submit arguments regarding the equitability of the situation.
>
> I did it, as getting my server running again is one of my least
> priorities out-of-game
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> I would stop comex doing such things, but I'd have to have his consent
> to act on behalf of Bayes.
You consented to cause Bayes to accept the nomination. I don't
believe you have any outstanding intents to act on behalf of Bayes, so
I'm not
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> I did it, as getting my server running again is one of my least
> priorities out-of-game ATM. I would implore an Agoran court not to
> obligate me to take out of game actions such as putting up a server.
I would be happy to run Bayes on anoth
On 26 Jan 2009, at 11:40, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I suggest the parties to Bayes stop putting obligations on it that it
can't perform.
I would stop comex doing such things, but I'd have to have his consent
to act on behalf of Bayes.
6 matches
Mail list logo
