Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Protectorate Anarchy

2009-05-11 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/5/11 Benjamin Caplan : > Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >> By the way, the rules don't require them to be disinterested anymore, >> do you think I should keep setting II=0 anyway? I think the original >> reason for the requirement was to prevent the anarchist to gain more >> notes than e already gains

DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Protectorate Anarchy

2009-05-11 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > By the way, the rules don't require them to be disinterested anymore, > do you think I should keep setting II=0 anyway? I think the original > reason for the requirement was to prevent the anarchist to gain more > notes than e already gains from fulfilling the duty. You sh