I wrote:
> On 6586 and 6587, Pavitra voted [DEPENDS(6582) -> AGAINST] * eir
> voting limit. This does not affect either overall result (total
> votes are 3F 2A on 6586, 17F 2A on 6587).
17F 1A on 6587, rather.
I wrote:
> Voting results for Proposals 6583 - 6589:
>
> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
>
> [If G.'s play of Kill Bill targetin
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM, comex wrote:
>> So close :)
>
> Propose it again. I'll actually vote FOR*2 this time.
>
Democracy would work too... -G.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 6583
>>
>> c. 6F
>> coppro 6F
>> G. 5F
>> Murphy 5A
>> Pavitra F
>> Yally F
>>
>> AI 4
>> VI 3.8
>> F/A 19/5
>
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 6583
>
> c. 6F
> coppro 6F
> G. 5F
> Murphy 5A
> Pavitra F
> Yally F
>
> AI 4
> VI 3.8
> F/A 19/5
So close :)
--
-c.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Voting results for Proposals 6583 - 6589:
>
> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
