On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Aaron Goldfein
wrote:
> That proposal was vetoed, however, giving it sufficient power.
AFAIK that only affects the decision's adoption index, not the proposal's.
--
-c.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:35 AM, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Ed Murphy
> wrote:
> > ID: 6632
> > Title: Second Class Players Do Not Earn Ergs
> > Amend the text in rule 2282 reading:
>
> Amendment fails due to insufficient power.
>
> --
> -c.
>
That proposal was vetoed, ho
2 matches
Mail list logo
