DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2321 assigned to woggle

2009-01-19 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 01:24 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: Gratuitous Arguments by Goethe: To see why, take the simple phrase you must get a coin before you can spend it. That doesn't mean getting a coin is a requirement otherwise I could just spend 1,000,000 coins and claim I have until after

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2321 assigned to woggle

2009-01-19 Thread comex
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: (One argument was that their version of R101 was sufficiently garbled that it was not only possible to bind other people to contracts against their will, but that being bound to a contract against your will was illegal!)

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2321 assigned to woggle

2009-01-19 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: (One argument was that their version of R101 was sufficiently garbled that it was not only possible to bind other people to contracts against their will, but that being bound to a contract against your will was

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2321 assigned to woggle

2009-01-19 Thread Jamie Dallaire
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: comex wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: (One argument was that their version of R101 was sufficiently garbled that it was not only possible to bind other people to