On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to
> keep the total number of scrolls everyone owns constant, than reset
> things to be the same for everyone).
Any idea how to integrate that with the way the contest has been
ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 00:08 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606
>>
>> == Equity Case 2606 ==
> This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to
> keep the t
Taral wrote:
> Would anyone care to propose a reasonable settlement? It seems like
> nobody really minded -- the game just started over. Mistakes happen.
Null judgement. If any party does mind, they can appeal.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606
>
> == Equity Case 2606 ==
>
> I accidentally published the list of what contracts are what and
> the contract provides no suit
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 00:08 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606
>
> == Equity Case 2606 ==
This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to
keep the total number of scrolls
5 matches
Mail list logo