Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2606 assigned to Taral

2009-07-03 Thread Taral
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to > keep the total number of scrolls everyone owns constant, than reset > things to be the same for everyone). Any idea how to integrate that with the way the contest has been

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2606 assigned to Taral

2009-07-03 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 00:08 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606 >> >> == Equity Case 2606 == > This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to > keep the t

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2606 assigned to Taral

2009-07-02 Thread Ed Murphy
Taral wrote: > Would anyone care to propose a reasonable settlement? It seems like > nobody really minded -- the game just started over. Mistakes happen. Null judgement. If any party does mind, they can appeal.

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2606 assigned to Taral

2009-07-02 Thread Taral
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606 > > ==  Equity Case 2606  == > >    I accidentally published the list of what contracts are what and >    the contract provides no suit

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2606 assigned to Taral

2009-06-29 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 00:08 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606 > > == Equity Case 2606 == This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to keep the total number of scrolls