The difficulty in ALL win conditions, that 2186 specifies one set
of conditions for calling something a win announcement, and that other
rules say that it has to be a winning announcement with different
(not additional) information (a win announcement that Proposal X has
been adopted in
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c) It causes at least one Winning Condition to be satisfied, as
defined by other rules.
For it to be a win announcement it must cause a Winning Condition to
be satisfied, but the Winning Condition can only
On 07/31/2010 11:56 AM, comex wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c) It causes at least one Winning Condition to be satisfied, as
defined by other rules.
For it to be a win announcement it must cause a Winning Condition to
be
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Circularity is easily resolved if you stop thinking of it that way:
IF NOT (IF this is a win announcement THEN someone satisfies a winning
condition) THEN this is not a win announcement.
The proposed rule says causes, not
4 matches
Mail list logo
