On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Recordkeepors can create assets arbitrarily, but not choose who gets
> them. (I suspect this is a really old holdover from the old asset
> rules.) As a result, they're unowned assets and the LFD gets them.
Only assets whose backing documents are
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 18:39 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > It would be a different issue if root were Insulator, I imagine; in that
> > case it might have been ambiguous whether root or the L&FD got the
> > resulting Rest.
>
> I don't believe the Insul
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> It would be a different issue if root were Insulator, I imagine; in that
> case it might have been ambiguous whether root or the L&FD got the
> resulting Rest.
I don't believe the Insulator is allowed to create rests in the LFD's
possession.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, comex wrote:
> I don't like my notes wasted :|
Boo hoo. I don't like my medals wasted.
-root
Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:14 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> root generally CANNOT create rests by announcement except in eir own
>> possession. Hence, eir "I create a rest" unambiguously means "I create a
>> rest in my possession".
>>
> It would be a different issue if root we
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:14 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >>> I spend G#G# to destroy root's Rest.
> >>
> >> I create a rest.
> >
> > In whose possession?
> >
> > This is a Win Announcement. root has a Medal.
>
> root genera
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> root, I suggest you create some more rests to make forcing wins at you
> more expensive.
It would also make it more expensive for me to use it when I want to.
I think one is ideal.
-root
comex wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> I spend G#G# to destroy root's Rest.
>>
>> I create a rest.
>
> In whose possession?
>
> This is a Win Announcement. root has a Medal.
root generally CANNOT create rests by announcement except in eir own
possession. Hence, eir
comex wrote:
> 2009/5/4 Ian Kelly :
>>> I'm actually mildly curious as to why you haven't done the Win
>>> Announcement yet.
>> I'm hoping to save it until a time when I don't already have MwoP.
>
> This is a win announcement: root owns a Medal.
But does not win, because e has a Rest.
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 13:37 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM, comex wrote:
> > 2009/5/4 Ian Kelly :
> >>> I'm actually mildly curious as to why you haven't done the Win
> >>> Announcement yet.
> >>
> >> I'm hoping to save it until a time when I don't already have MwoP.
> >
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM, comex wrote:
> 2009/5/4 Ian Kelly :
>>> I'm actually mildly curious as to why you haven't done the Win
>>> Announcement yet.
>>
>> I'm hoping to save it until a time when I don't already have MwoP.
>
> This is a win announcement: root owns a Medal.
Fails; I have a
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:51 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> I just noticed I've been neglecting part of the Scorekeepor's report.
>> In the future, this will be published with the rest of the report.
>>
>> Medals
>> --
>> 3-Scroll Rodney 1
>>
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:51 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I just noticed I've been neglecting part of the Scorekeepor's report.
> In the future, this will be published with the rest of the report.
>
> Medals
> --
> 3-Scroll Rodney 1
> root1
I'm actually mildly curious as to wh
13 matches
Mail list logo