Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread comex
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > Recordkeepors can create assets arbitrarily, but not choose who gets > them. (I suspect this is a really old holdover from the old asset > rules.) As a result, they're unowned assets and the LFD gets them. Only assets whose backing documents are

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 18:39 -0400, comex wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > It would be a different issue if root were Insulator, I imagine; in that > > case it might have been ambiguous whether root or the L&FD got the > > resulting Rest. > > I don't believe the Insul

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread comex
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > It would be a different issue if root were Insulator, I imagine; in that > case it might have been ambiguous whether root or the L&FD got the > resulting Rest. I don't believe the Insulator is allowed to create rests in the LFD's possession.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, comex wrote: > I don't like my notes wasted :| Boo hoo. I don't like my medals wasted. -root

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:14 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> root generally CANNOT create rests by announcement except in eir own >> possession. Hence, eir "I create a rest" unambiguously means "I create a >> rest in my possession". >> > It would be a different issue if root we

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:14 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > comex wrote: > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > >>> I spend G#G# to destroy root's Rest. > >> > >> I create a rest. > > > > In whose possession? > > > > This is a Win Announcement. root has a Medal. > > root genera

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > root, I suggest you create some more rests to make forcing wins at you > more expensive. It would also make it more expensive for me to use it when I want to. I think one is ideal. -root

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Benjamin Caplan
comex wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: >>> I spend G#G# to destroy root's Rest. >> >> I create a rest. > > In whose possession? > > This is a Win Announcement. root has a Medal. root generally CANNOT create rests by announcement except in eir own possession. Hence, eir

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > 2009/5/4 Ian Kelly : >>> I'm actually mildly curious as to why you haven't done the Win >>> Announcement yet. >> I'm hoping to save it until a time when I don't already have MwoP. > > This is a win announcement: root owns a Medal. But does not win, because e has a Rest.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 13:37 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM, comex wrote: > > 2009/5/4 Ian Kelly : > >>> I'm actually mildly curious as to why you haven't done the Win > >>> Announcement yet. > >> > >> I'm hoping to save it until a time when I don't already have MwoP. > >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM, comex wrote: > 2009/5/4 Ian Kelly : >>> I'm actually mildly curious as to why you haven't done the Win >>> Announcement yet. >> >> I'm hoping to save it until a time when I don't already have MwoP. > > This is a win announcement: root owns a Medal. Fails; I have a

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:51 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: >> I just noticed I've been neglecting part of the Scorekeepor's report. >> In the future, this will be published with the rest of the report. >> >> Medals >> -- >> 3-Scroll Rodney     1 >>

DIS: Re: OFF: [Scorekeepor] Medals

2009-05-04 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:51 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > I just noticed I've been neglecting part of the Scorekeepor's report. > In the future, this will be published with the rest of the report. > > Medals > -- > 3-Scroll Rodney 1 > root1 I'm actually mildly curious as to wh