comex wrote:
On 6/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, OscarMeyr needs to re-judge CFJ 1621.
Not until I reassign it to him, I think. But I am waiting for all
three actions until the CotC database is in a good mood again. :)
Ah, you're right, R1447(c) is pragmatic.
The Cot
On 6/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
root wrote:
> On 6/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> CFJ 1677 is hereby assigned to the Pineapple Partnership.
>
> The Pineapple Partnership is not a player, as per CFJ 1684, so it
> can't judge CFJs.
>
> But wasn't there an appeal of CFJ
root wrote:
On 6/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CFJ 1677 is hereby assigned to the Pineapple Partnership.
The Pineapple Partnership is not a player, as per CFJ 1684, so it
can't judge CFJs.
But wasn't there an appeal of CFJ 1684 in progress? I don't recall
There is, yes. The Cot
On 6/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CFJ 1677 is hereby assigned to the Pineapple Partnership.
The Pineapple Partnership is not a player, as per CFJ 1684, so it
can't judge CFJs.
But wasn't there an appeal of CFJ 1684 in progress? I don't recall
4 matches
Mail list logo
