On 11/5/07, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/07, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby assign comex as judge of CFJ 1779.
Pseudo-judgement: UNDETERMINED, per the clear precedent set by CFJ 1744.
In CFJ 1744, there was no evidence
On Monday 05 November 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
On 11/5/07, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/07, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby assign comex as judge of CFJ 1779.
Pseudo-judgement: UNDETERMINED, per the clear precedent set
On 11/4/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby assign comex as judge of CFJ 1779.
Pseudo-judgement: UNDETERMINED, per the clear precedent set by CFJ 1744.
3 matches
Mail list logo