Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-14 Thread Ed Murphy
ihope wrote: On 10/04/2008, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can this part be table-ified? Maybe with the members listed in the same section. What do you mean? Make a table with the contracts as rows and people as columns and put an X wherever the person is a party to the contract?

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-11 Thread ihope
On 10/04/2008, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can this part be table-ified? Maybe with the members listed in the same section. What do you mean? Make a table with the contracts as rows and people as columns and put an X wherever the person is a party to the contract? --Ivan Hope CXXVII

DIS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-10 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This report is self-ratifying It's not. The only things that are self-ratifying are: * A public message's claim as to who published it [R2170] * The list of instances of a class asset in the recordkeepor's report [R2166] * A

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-10 Thread ihope
On 10/04/2008, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This report is self-ratifying It's not. You're right. I thought all reports were self-ratifying. Oh well. --Ivan Hope CXXVII

DIS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-10 Thread Ed Murphy
Ivan Hope wrote: Agoran Twister (public, contest) The Agoran Agricultural Association (public, contest) Fantasy Rules (public, contest) Enigma (public, contest) Brainfuck Golf (public, contest) The AFO (private, partnership) Pineapple Partnership (public, partnership) The Left Hand