On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> If such a contract did not exist (which it may) it might very well be
>> a public contract, as there is no reason that you would need to be
>> aware of a non-existent public contract.
>
> Public contracts exist, o
On 02/08/2010 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If such a contract did not exist (which it may) it might very well be
a public contract, as there is no reason that you would need to be
aware of a non-existent public contract.
Public contracts exist, or else they would be neither contracts nor public
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, ais523 wrote:
>>> (/me waits for the UNDEAD to find a way out of this one...)
>>
>> If such a group existed, which I neither confirm nor deny, its
>> deniable existence would neithe
> Proto: Ratify the text and membership of the following contracts:
> Airstrip One
> Fantasy Rules Contest
> (whatever else someone explicitly wants to preserve)
> and terminate all other public contracts.
Please let me know if you want to add something to the whatever-else
part of the list
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, ais523 wrote:
>> (/me waits for the UNDEAD to find a way out of this one...)
>
> If such a group existed, which I neither confirm nor deny, its
> deniable existence would neither confirm nor deny the fact that
> it has alre
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, ais523 wrote:
> (/me waits for the UNDEAD to find a way out of this one...)
If such a group existed, which I neither confirm nor deny, its
deniable existence would neither confirm nor deny the fact that
it has already found a way out of this one.
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 08:11 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
> >> Title: Agree to Disagree
>
> > I'm going to request that Agorans vote FOR this proposal unless we see
> > someone willing to step up to the plate as Notary.
>
> Proto: Ratify the text and membership of the following con
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Title: Point Blank
> Author: Murphy
> Chamber: Purple
Ok, you must just have a database pointer wrong somewhere. Got the color
right, though. -G.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
>>> Title: Agree to Disagree
>
>> I'm going to request that Agorans vote FOR this proposal unless we see
>> someone willing to step up to the plate as Notary.
>
> Proto: Ratify the text and membership of the following contracts:
coppro wrote:
>> Title: Agree to Disagree
> I'm going to request that Agorans vote FOR this proposal unless we see
> someone willing to step up to the plate as Notary.
Proto: Ratify the text and membership of the following contracts:
Airstrip One
Fantasy Rules Contest
(whatever else some
On 02/06/2010 02:53 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Title: Agree to Disagree
Author: coppro
AI: 3.0
II: 3
Chamber: Red
Repeal every rule (in numerical order) that, in the most recent
publication of the FLR prior to the publication of this proposal, was
in the Contract Law category.
Repeal Rule 2169
Tiger wrote:
> All proposals made distributable and then removed from the pool before
> being distributed are also still distributable, but too many to list
> here.
Not since you fixed R1607 a few months ago.
12 matches
Mail list logo
