Ah. I guess I'll vote then, so I stop being humiliated. :P
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> The rules require em to issue one, but it doesn’t do anything. It’s just
> that—a reminder.
>
> Gaelan
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2017, at 6:28 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> What's a Humiliating Pub
The rules require em to issue one, but it doesn’t do anything. It’s just that—a
reminder.
Gaelan
> On Oct 5, 2017, at 6:28 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> What's a Humiliating Public Reminder? Is it actually something in the rules
> or something you made up?
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:38 AM, VJ Ra
What's a Humiliating Public Reminder? Is it actually something in the rules
or something you made up?
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:38 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Whoops fair cop, yup. I retract my most recent CFJ.
>
> Sorry Trigon.
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > The same ru
The same rule makes PRESENT an option later on. In fact, that clause
explicitly overrides the previous one:
"The previous notwithstanding:
...
- PRESENT is always a valid vote, with no effect on the outcome
except counting towards quorum."
-Aris
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 12:04 A
Changed my mind on Gaelan's actually, reading 3569 closely his vote
seems to be legit.
Your new vote does work yes :)
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Rubin Stacy wrote:
> PF
>
> --
> Trigon
> --
>
> On Oct 5, 2017 1:11 AM, "Rubin Stacy" wrote:
>>
>> Fine. Then let my vote be retrac
Fine. Then let my vote be retracted and replaced with {PSS, G.}. Does that
work?
--
Trigon
--
On Oct 5, 2017 1:04 AM, "VJ Rada" wrote:
> I don't think either your vote here or Gaelan's vote worked. According
> to rule 955 as interpreted by Alexis's most recent CFJ, in this
> context "th
I unconditionally vote for Assessor as follows: {Gaelan, PSS} followed by {all
players nichdel votes for, in the order in which e votes for them, excluding
Gaelan and PSS}.
I list performing exactly the above action (considering any changes to
nichdel's vote) as Performable By Agency (GII).
Th
They don't even count towards quorum. You need to make a definitive vote.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:53 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Conditional votes do not work, see Alexis's latest CFJ.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> I conditionally vote for Assessor as follows: {Gaelan,
Conditional votes do not work, see Alexis's latest CFJ.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I conditionally vote for Assessor as follows: {Gaelan, PSS} followed by {all
> players nichdel votes for, in the order in which e votes for them, excluding
> Gaelan and PSS}
>
> Gaela
9 matches
Mail list logo
