Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-22 Thread Nicholas Evans
I also wouldn't support punishment. During slow times I've published the registrar's report roughly monthly instead of weekly. It didn't make much difference because few things currently rely on the # of players. If I was punished for that, I'd probably have just vacated the seat. If there's someon

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-19 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Maybe allow a status in which you become the provisional office and are not payed, but also not fined. On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Good point. I suggest that we also levy a fine. Maybe their officer > >

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Good point. I suggest that we also levy a fine. Maybe their officer > pay from all of the months in which they didn't report, with some form > of fine on top of that? Just as a note, I've been trying to give the Arbitor's job away fo

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-19 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
The fine idea seems more punitive and therefore I support it. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen > wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM Quazi

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-18 Thread Aris Merchant
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM Quazie wrote: > the referee's quota, and if an officer receives some number N `Report > Cards' - 8 perhaps - then any player may oust the current officer from > their > position. > >

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-18 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM Quazie wrote: the referee's quota, and if an officer receives some number N `Report Cards' - 8 perhaps - then any player may oust the current officer from their position. Any player already can do that, by deputising for the office. Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-18 Thread Aris Merchant
Might I suggest penalizing them only if fewer than x number of other officers were tardy in their reports? Also, I like the auto shredding after doing a report on time. -Aris On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:44 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I wo

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I would like this idea as along as there was some way to account for whole game lulls. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Quazie wrote: > Originally I was thinking these report cards were automatically issued, > thus `robo-ref` but then i never said that in th

Re: DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-18 Thread Quazie
Originally I was thinking these report cards were automatically issued, thus `robo-ref` but then i never said that in the body of the post. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM Quazie wrote: > I'm a little sadened by this current lull in official weekly and monthly > reports, and so I'm thinking of c

DIS: Robo-Ref-ideas

2017-04-18 Thread Quazie
I'm a little sadened by this current lull in official weekly and monthly reports, and so I'm thinking of creating a class of card for late reports - `Report Card` for example [1 card issued after a weekly report has been late for a week, and 2 cards issued when a monthly report has been late for 2