Contracts, basically. However, I still have the draft around and since
contracts seem to be in limbo, I’ll put it up again and try to get it under
vote.
If we need escrow we can always reinvent it.
-o
> On Oct 12, 2017, at 9:46 PM, Aris Merchant
>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Where does it say that a transfer recipient defaults to agora? By
> my reading that would fail for being ambiguous.
I mean that spending might be a particular kind of transferring that
defaults to Agora. It would
Where does it say that a transfer recipient defaults to agora? By
my reading that would fail for being ambiguous.
Also, my recent frustrations is several folks (not just you) have been
working on Big Ideas so we've deferred making minor fixes like that,
But the Big Ideas have been delayed and
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:23 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > Is it just me, or is spending a shiny currently undefined?
>
> No, we had a discussion of that last month, when I brought it
> up.
>
> There was a pseudo-conclusion that
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Is it just me, or is spending a shiny currently undefined?
No, we had a discussion of that last month, when I brought it
up.
There was a pseudo-conclusion that spent couldn't be a
synonym for paid, because paid requires specifying the
recipient. So
Is it just me, or is spending a shiny currently undefined?
6 matches
Mail list logo