On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:53 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Sgeo wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
> Actually, it will be a positiv
Sgeo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching multiple
archives), for w
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Sgeo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
>>> I don't; there's no reason to be using the agoranomic.org archives,
>>> which are handy in a pinch but pretty clunky.
>>
>> I have every reason to do so; it's my preferred
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
>>>
>>> Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching multiple
>>> archives), for whom I have mor
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, ais523 wrote:
> IMO, something like an AAA mill
> purchase is rather more contentful than the typical a-b content,
IMO, [the opposite]
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> As a supplement/alternative, what would people think of criminalizing
>> large numbers of public messages --
No.
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 23:52 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> As a supplement/alternative, what would people think of criminalizing
> large numbers of public messages -- say, 8 or 16 per person per week? It
> wouldn't platonically cancel any messages, and it should encourage
> people to lump their actions to
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:21 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid option
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>> As a supplement/alternative, what would people think of criminalizing
>> large numbers of public messages -- say, 8 or 16 per person per week? It
>> wouldn't platonically cancel any messages, and it should encourage
>> people to lump their actions together. O
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists
AGAINST
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I ca
Pavitra wrote:
> As a supplement/alternative, what would people think of criminalizing
> large numbers of public messages -- say, 8 or 16 per person per week? It
> wouldn't platonically cancel any messages, and it should encourage
> people to lump their actions together. On the other hand, it migh
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Still, how about this compromise: start with Agora-Contracts as a
> discussion forum, encourage contests to amend their charters to allow
> "boring" business to happen there, then make it public later if that
> doesn't work.
This feels like the right solution to me. It combi
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I nomic in many spare cycles in a traveling/many multiple computer job, so
> can't depend on an installed base. Dislike most web clients (hate gmail
> for reason you mentioned) - most dependable I've got is term window and
> Pine (after many ye
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I have every reason to do so; it's my preferred way to look back at most
>> things. -G.
>
> Why?
I nomic in many spare cycles in a traveling/many multiple computer job, so
can't depend on an installed base. Di
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I have every reason to do so; it's my preferred way to look back at
most
things. -G.
Why?
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
>>
>> Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching multiple
>> archives), for whom I have more sympathy.
>
> I don't; there's no reason to be using the
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> That being said, I've wished for over a year that the AAA would just
> find their own darn list. I don't see why we should make things harder
> on the recorkeepors for their convenience.
Alternative: create Agora-Contests; make it a discussion forum for
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
>
> Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching multiple
> archives), for whom I have more sympathy.
I don't; there's no reason to be using the agoranomic.org archives,
which are handy in
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> AGAINST. Encourage minor contest traffic elsewhere, instead.
>> (All recordkeepors will have to check all PFs anyway, so nothing
>> is gained). -G.
>
> Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
Actually, it will b
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> AGAINST. Encourage minor contest traffic elsewhere, instead.
> (All recordkeepors will have to check all PFs anyway, so nothing
> is gained). -G.
Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
--
-c.
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGA
coppro wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
s/business/actions/
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST
AGAINST; we already have 4 public fora.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequ
FOR. There's no advantage of a digest over a second list that can be
sequestered into its own folder/label, and many disadvantages. I will
just lump the messages into the same label for reading, but I can see
the need for reducing traffic.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 5, 2009, at 6:21 PM,
2009/8/6 Sean Hunt :
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST, and
> PRESE
Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST, and
> PRESENT.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:21, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
> Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
> agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
> subsequently make it Public. The valid options are
I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST, and
PRESENT. The set of eligible voters
28 matches
Mail list logo
