Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Expressing the contrary of a given statement is not always trivial,
unless you resort to the form "The statement 'foo bar' is false".
I think it is sufficiently simple, generally a matter of inserting the
word "not".
In this case, the statement will generally
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Expressing the contrary of a given statement is not always trivial,
>unless you resort to the form "The statement 'foo bar' is false".
I think it is sufficiently simple, generally a matter of inserting the
word "not".
>require the rule to be annotated with the Statement and Judg
Zefram wrote:
The Judge of any CFJ, the Statement of which alleges that a Rule
should be interpreted in a certain way, which is judged TRUE
or FALSE, may, at eir discretion, issue an Order requiring the
Rulekeepor to annotate the Rule in question accordingly. If
Proto-proposal:
---
Amend rule 789 "Orders to Annotate Rules" by replacing the paragraph
that begins "The Judge of any CFJ" with:
The Judge of any CFJ, the Statement of which alleges that a Rule
should be interpreted in a certain way, which is judged TRUE
or FALSE, may, at
4 matches
Mail list logo
