proto-proposal: list VC behaviour by colour
AI: 2
{{{
Amend rule 2126 by replacing the text
VCs may be gained as follows:
a) When an interested proposal is adopted, its proposer gains a
number of Red VCs equal to the integer portion of the
proposal's adoption index, minus the number of Red VCs that e
has gained in this way earlier in the same week (down to a
minimum of zero), and each coauthor named in the proposal
gains one Red VC unless e gained a VC in this way earlier in
the same week.
b) At the end of each month, for each office with a report, the
player (if any) who held that office for the majority of that
month gains two Green VCs (if the office has a weekly report)
or one Green VC (if it has only a monthly report), unless
another person deputised for that office while that player
held that office during that month.
c) A player who assigns a judgement to a judicial question
within the time limit when first obliged to gains one Blue
VC.
VCs may be lost as follows:
a) When a proposal's voting index is less than half its adoption
index, its proposer loses one Red VC.
b) At the end of each month, for each office, for each player
who has held that office during that month, if another person
deputised for that office while that player held that office
during that month then that player loses one Green VC.
c) A player who is recused from a judicial case because a
judicial question has remained applicable, open, and unjudged
loses one Blue VC. A player who is the prior judge in an
appeal case where a judgement other than AFFIRM is assigned
to the question on disposition loses one Blue VC.
with
VCs are gained and lost as follows:
(+R) When an interested proposal is adopted, its proposer gains
a number of Red VCs equal to the integer portion of the
proposal's adoption index, minus the number of Red VCs that
e has gained in this way earlier in the same week (down to
a minimum of zero), and each coauthor named in the proposal
gains one Red VC unless e gained a VC in this way earlier
in the same week.
(-R) When a proposal's voting index is less than half its
adoption index, its proposer loses one Red VC.
(+G) At the end of each month, for each office with a report,
the player (if any) who held that office for the majority
of that month gains two Green VCs (if the office has a
weekly report) or one Green VC (if it has only a monthly
report), unless another person deputised for that office
while that player held that office during that month.
(-G) At the end of each month, for each office, for each player
who has held that office during that month, if another
person deputised for that office while that player held
that office during that month then that player loses one
Green VC.
(+B) A player who assigns a judgement to a judicial question
within the time limit when first obliged to gains one Blue
VC.
(-B) A player who is recused from a judicial case because a
judicial question has remained applicable, open, and
unjudged loses one Blue VC. A player who is the prior
judge in an appeal case where a judgement other than AFFIRM
is assigned to the question on disposition loses one Blue
VC.
[None of the text that actually awards or removes VCs is changed. The
differences are: (a) all in one list, putting rewards and
corresponding penalties next to each other; (b) meaningful item
labels, easier to maintain.]
[With the various protos that would edit the rule text that is relevant
here, this proto will need a bit of reformulation before it is actually
proposed.]
}}}
-zefram
