V.J. Rada
> Text: Repeal rule 2125 "Regulated Actions"
Jason Cobb wrote:
> Simply striking the last sentence of the Rule would suffice...
I think we'd always like to have some sort of protection against regulating
breathing and the like. Grabbed some old language from the Rights era,
maybe we
I think that might fall victim to the same thing I tried with CFJ 3737.
When we have contracts, any player can get the Rules to prohibit
anything (at least for certain players), thus removing the protections.
So, when I create a contract that prohibits breathing, breathing would
be indirectly "
On 6/16/2019 5:43 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 6/16/19 8:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> V.J. Rada
>> > Text: Repeal rule 2125 "Regulated Actions"
>>
>> Jason Cobb wrote:
>> > Simply striking the last sentence of the Rule would suffice...
>>
>> I think we'd always like to have some sort of protect
Anyone dumb enough to consent to a contract forbidding breathing deserves
any blots that may be imposed, in my view. No such protections are needed,
and if somehow somebody scams someone into such a contract, the referee can
use eir discretion to not punish. I stand by my original stance/
On Mon,
Maybe a model like this would work:
- _Each_ requirement-creating entity (including both the Rules at large,
each contract, regulations, etc.) has its own set of "regulated
actions", and cannot be interpreted to say anything about actions
outside of this set. This would keep the stipulation th
On 6/16/2019 6:10 PM, Rebecca wrote:
Anyone dumb enough to consent to a contract forbidding breathing deserves
any blots that may be imposed, in my view. No such protections are needed,
and if somehow somebody scams someone into such a contract, the referee can
use eir discretion to not punish.
The regulated action would be breaching a contract you consented to, which
is unlawful under the rules. It wouldn't matter what was in the contract. I
think any reasonable human judge would rule as such.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 6/16/2019 6:10 PM, Rebecca wrote:
7 matches
Mail list logo