"At the discretion of a judge" is an awful way to put in, because you're
explicitly tying the platonic gamestate to the whims of a judge. It's
basically saying "a loop fails or doesn't fail; whether it does so is
completely up to a judge who can only look at the case later". What is the
game state
Oops. I think I can fix most of those either by cutting things or
tweaking bits. There's one complaint I can't think of a good way to
fix (the thing about invalidating loops), but I hope that isn't a
deal-breaker on its own?
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> You haven't
You haven't addressed most of my concerns from the last draft, so I will
still be strongly voting against, and likely deregistering if it passes.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017, 00:33 Aris Merchant, <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Title: Conditionals and Determinacy v3
> Adoption index: 3.0
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
