Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Proposal: More ID numbers (AI=2, Distributable via fee) > > Does this mean you just paid the fee?  That looks like CFJ-worthy > ambiguity there... Yeah, by the letter of it I'm not sure it's possible to make a proposal Distributable before su

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, comex wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> Proposal: More ID numbers (AI=2, Distributable via fee) > > > > Does this mean you just paid the fee?  That looks like CFJ-worthy > > ambiguity there... > > Yeah, by the letter of it I'm not sure it's p

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I think we've always been ok with "I submit the following proposal and pay a > fee to make it distributable:" and there was some court case a long time > ago that it was ok.  Maybe not.  It was the fact that your sentence no verb: > are you say

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> I don't think it's common enough to make a significant difference, and >> it's rather unusual IMO that proposals in the Proposal Pool have to be >> referred to by title when just about every other tracked body of text >> has an ID number. > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > In creating my proposal archive, I did notice that Zefram used a "pool > number", distinct from the distributed proposal ID. I don't know if > this was just for eir own recordkeeping or if it was rules-defined > when e was Promotor; I don't remember i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> In creating my proposal archive, I did notice that Zefram used a "pool >> number", distinct from the distributed proposal ID.  I don't know if >> this was just for eir own recordkeeping or if it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

Yally wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 13:51, Sean Hunt > wrote: > > in case of a tie then the first of those players alphabetically > > > Oh, I see how it is. You could always change your nickname to Adams...