On 6/18/2018 10:38 AM, Corona wrote:
I issue a humiliating public reminder to the following persons for not
voting on the current Medals of Honour decision:
Gaelan, G., Cuddle Beam, Trigon, Corona, VJ Rada, Kenyon, Ouri, twg,
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, omd, o, Quazie, pokes, 天火狐、Telnaior
FUN CONTINUATION:
The rule also reads:
After a player is awarded a Medal of Honour, all
players who were previously eligible for a Medal of Honour become
no longer eligible.
Since a "player" was not awarded the Medal, the previously-eligible
players are STILL e
This what happens when you let new players (i.e. me) make proposals
without checking them that much. lol.
On 6/11/2018 1:19 AM, Corona wrote:
Sure.
I award FAILED QUORUM a Medal of Honour for May 2018. Wear it proudly,
FAILED QUORUM!
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Kerim Aydin
wro
However, by ais523's logic, from the previous Decision you're supposed
to award a Medal to FAILED QUORUM...?
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
> Ah, nevermind then.
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > No, the whole thing just fails I'm afr
Ah, nevermind then.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> No, the whole thing just fails I'm afraid (Rule 2529/3):
>In the second Eastman week of an Agoran month, if there are any
>players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour, the Herald CAN, by
Oh yeah, I thought so, I just couldn't find the relevant paragraph. Well,
now I have to wait 7 days to resolve, I guess.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 22:26 +0200, Corona wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a Med
No, the whole thing just fails I'm afraid (Rule 2529/3):
In the second Eastman week of an Agoran month, if there are any
players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour, the Herald CAN, by
announcement, initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded
a Medal of Hon
heh, probably my fault.
I think that the normal votes of PRESENT and conditionals are still
valid, though. Not sure.
On 2/20/2018 10:43 AM, Corona wrote:
But the rule describes them as "votes" [...For this decision, the valid votes
are all players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour...].
But the rule describes them as "votes" [...For this decision, the valid votes
are all players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour...].
~Corona
On 02:00, Feb 20, 2018, at 02:00, "Ørjan Johansen" wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Corona wrote:
>
>> For this decision, the valid votes are {Murphy, A
Yeah, actually you're eligible but not a valid vote. [...For this decision, the
valid votes are all players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour...]
On 14:09, Feb 20, 2018, at 14:09, ATMunn wrote:
>Am I really a valid vote even though I'm not a player? I guess there's
>nothing in the rule say
10 matches
Mail list logo
