On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 00:32 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Yally wrote:
CoE: Billy Pilgrim and root are not players.
Admitted, they lost their props upon deregistration.
I intend, without objection, to destroy all props owned by the
Lost and Found Department.
I object. Transferring them to
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 23:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Parties to 3-Scroll Rodne
ais523
allispaul
BobTHJ
coppro
comex
c-walker
OscarMeyr
Pavitra
Quazie
Tiger
I raise an equity case regarding 3-Scroll Rodney, in that I accidentally
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 19:27 +0100, C-walker wrote:
16th: Coppro discusses new criminal justice system.
G. protos the return of CFJ dismissal.
Ais523 supposedly acts on behalf of myndzi to register em.
It was my idea (sorry), but pikhq got there first.
--
ais523
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 12:26 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Notary List of Contracts 20 Jun 09
The Notary has a weekly duty of tracking various switches, too. This
means that two different rules require me to publish a list of public
contracts (a requirement to publish a list of
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 12:37 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Well, publishing a description of the Notary's report is not an
official part of the report and I don't have very much space to
squeeze all that in there, so, do you have an alternative to List of
Contracts?
Contract Switches might
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 13:35 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why don't we just removed the silly plain text requirement?
Because we want the archives to be usable.
I have issues even editing various player's emails
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:12 +0100, C-walker wrote:
When a player (the attorney) acts on behalf of another player to
perform an action, that action is performed as if the attorney is the
player e is acting on behalf of.
Hypothetical contract: {{Anyone but ais523 can leave this contract.}}
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:29 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
G. wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
6372 D 1 2.0 G. Transition Team
AGAINST
I'm a little puzzled by opposition to this (not just on your part, other
voters too...) is there a bug I'm missing?
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Warrigal wrote:
...that I should have two different jobs thrust upon me at the same
time as I'm installed as Conductor. I resign as Conductor, thereby
fulfilling the prophecy laid
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 01:34 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Your voting limit is 8.
Incorrect.
Rule .
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:36 +0100, C-walker wrote:
Really? I thought recordkeepors could create assets that they
recordkeep, but they got to the LFD because the recordkeepor doesn't
have an ability to give them owners.
I don't think the assets rule specifies whose possession the assets
Comments in this proto are shown with quote marks; they won't be part of
the final proposal, if we propose this one.
Protoproposal (AI 2, II 3):
Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards:
{{{
Cards are a class of assets, restricted to players, whose recordkeepor
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Er, here's the alternate one - currently just finishing up the card
definitions.
ais523, how do you want to proceed, pick one or merge?
Probably best to pick yours, as it's more mature, and then merge in a
few features of mine. In
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:35 +0100, C-walker wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards:
I suggest repealing 2126 and creating a new rule in its place.
Otherwise I like it.
2126 has the
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 13:12 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
Also, while I agree with ais523 that there should be a maximum hand
size (to keep from having to track hundreds of cards for inactive
players) I think that hand size should be set much higher than eir
proposal suggestedpaticularly if
I've edited out the bits of the proposal I think are unproblematic; here
are comments on the other bits.
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 12:20 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If a card class has a position, there is always exactly one such
instance of the class in existence, and it CANNOT be
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 14:06 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
the server seems to be gone.
I object; does anyone have a recent tarball? The PNP contract allows for
the situation in which the existing PerlNomic server dies.
--
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 02:37 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
For each of the following not-yet-labels, I intend with 2 party support
to append it to the list of labels:
- COPPRO WOOPS
- DIVIDE BY ZERO
-
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 16:19 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
I favor this case and intend to deliver a good-of-the-game judgement.
I object.
--
ais523
Sorry, couldn't resist
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 14:18 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
We should bring back Boons: a Boon for meritorious action of [N notes or
new currency] may be given to a player by a judge finding that the action
is deserving, with Agoran Consent. [This can be done by proposal now, this
makes it a
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 11:51 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I deregister the PNP.
Fails; the PNP is a person.
Err, nevermind, Ranier isn't a
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 02:14 +0900, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
Judge Tanner Swett's Arguments:
TRUE, because unless you believe a
contract is a forum, you have no reason to attempt to flip its
Publicity to Public; any attempt to do so is almost certainly an
attempt to flip its
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 14:28 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I think we just have to assume in the absence of evidence to the
contrary. Are there old CFJ decisions that would have to be overturned
if it turned out that Hillary Rodham Clinton was a player?
I doubt it, those were judged SLIPPERY for
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 00:08 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606
== Equity Case 2606 ==
This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to
keep the total number of scrolls
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 10:20 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
As I have said, I don't know for sure when I will next suddenly
disappear for over a week, so I leave all contests except AAA and the
Cookie Jar.
If you disappear for a couple of days, and I notice, I'll intend to make
you inactive, to
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 05:10 -0700, Taral wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
to satisfy the Winning Condition of Musicianship, and I win by
Musicianship.
Congrats. :)
Happy birthday Agora, by the way!
Happy birthday Agora!
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:00 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
As I'm trying to sort out who gained notes for awarding points - who
was this constanza person, and what happened? Could someone who
actually understood this scam please explain?
constanza was presumably a third-party who agreed to help
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 08:43 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
I spend G# F# F to gain E.
I spend G# F# F to gain E.
I'm not entirely sure the Note math works here. G# to F# is two
semitones, F to E is one. Or have I misread what you were trying to do?
--
ais523
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:18 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
If Conductor is still vacant when Murphy's and BobTHJ's win attempts
have settled, I'll deputise to publish this report for real. And since
I have made it anyway, I'll post it for the new conductor to use
should e be installed soon.
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:35 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of me not wanting to become
inactive due to bad stuff happening to, I dunno, maybe my crops or
notes or something. But it seems not, and I think that I will at least
have time to realize that I'm
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:42 +0100, C-walker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, Wooble wrote:
Happy Birthday, Agora!
I thought we went by UTC time? Anyway, Happy Birthday, Agora!
We do for almost everything, the Birthday's an exception. Also, putting
game actions in your sig?
--
ais523
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:27 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/29 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:18 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
If Conductor is still vacant when Murphy's and BobTHJ's win attempts
have settled, I'll deputise to publish this report for real
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:08 +0100, C-walker wrote:
Thanks for explaining that (to everyone that did). And are game action
in your sig considered bad form? Sorry if they are, that was a one
off.
It's the sort of sneaky action that makes it look like you're trying to
hide something; not
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:09 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
I change my name to 2.71828183... or e for short.
I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 00:08 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I'm happy for any thoughts on names, by the way. English is not my
first language and I'm not into charity or any kind of business or
organisation, so I just picked names that sounded good.
I do like the idea of charity; but, I think it
This is another test.
I'm starting to worry that Yahoo! can't send truly
plain-text messages at all...
--
ais523
--- On Wed, 23/9/09, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
You're a damn immoral liar, claiming that your mousetrap
would only be
used for that proposal to me.
Shame.
I didn't; I also claimed that I would try to punish players who attempted to
object by stealing/destroying
--- On Sun, 4/10/09, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I initiate a criminal case regarding the NoV against
coppro.
Arguments: As a member of ə, it is my responsibility to
ensure that it does not violate the rules. This is not a
specific obligation, but an ongoing
--- On Sun, 11/10/09, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: DIS: Proto: Deal refactor (notes at bottom)
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Date: Sunday, 11 October, 2009, 12:19 AM
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Dealing Refactor (AI=?, II=3)
I will
I call for judgement on the statement It is possible to submit a Call
for Judgement by sending a message to a Discussion Forum., submitting
it to the Justiciar.
Arguments: The Justiciar probably reads the discussion fora, at least
occasionally, so is likely to receive the message. Although the
--- On Tue, 20/10/09, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:53 PM,
Alex Smith
callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this. Without
being able to see coppro's reasoning, I have no idea whether
eir judgement
--- On Sun, 25/10/09, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose. One point is that it would be nice to
limit mousetraps to
impose unfair obligations, not I can act on behalf of
you to steal
all your assets and deregister. Your home is your
castle and
whatnot-- in this case, your person.
--- On Thu, 29/10/09, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com
Subject: BUS: Proposal: Free Parking
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Date: Thursday, 29 October, 2009, 7:31 PM
I submit the following:
Free Parking
AI: 2
II: 1
{
In R2262, add the
--- On Tue, 1/12/09, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
As required by R2259, I destroy the following cards in the
IBA's possession (selected by random.org; d...@nomic.net is
infeasible for this):
It's not that infeasible. Assign a number to each card, then
generate random numbers from 1 to
I harvest 2741 and 2742 for 4 WRV.
I IBA-deposit 4 WRV.
I harvest 2471 and 2472 for 4 WRV.
I IBA-withdraw 4 WRV.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 11:30 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, comex wrote:
FUGITIVES OF THE OLD LAW (Players who left Under a Cloud,
unofficial list)
I believe a proposal in Oct-Nov officially gave all these guys one Rest,
making them
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 02:18 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
I, coppro, intend this to be a public message under Agoran law.
All Agoran players, please read http://paste.debian.net/66733/
(hereafter referred to as The Paste).
I CFJ { The Paste is a public message. }
I CFJ { The Paste would, if
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:40 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Arguments:
This is a classical case of the Paradox of Self-Amendment. The rule says
that If any change to the gamestate would cause ... any change in the
effect or attributes of this rule ... including its repeal ... it is
cancelled and
--- On Sun, 9/5/10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
From: Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6721-6723
To: Agora Business agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Date: Sunday, 9 May, 2010, 4:29
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ed Murphy
--- On Mon, 10/5/10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 9 May 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
The message quoted in evidence began a
coup.
In other news, I announce the ceremonial shilling
of the palace.
Hrm, I totally don't know here. I personally saw the
message when it
--- On Tue, 11/5/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
I sit up.
ITYM I stand up.
Last I checked, players couldn't stand by announcement;
has that changed? (However, given that we're apparently
in an emergency session, it's unlikely to make much of a
difference given that
It seems that Darth Cliche (who is IIRC a former player of Agora), in
protest at BlogNomic's slipping membership numbers, decided to gain a
dictatorship via exploiting a rule designed to let em (as BlogNomic's
RNG, its current name for the Emperor) make interesting gameplay;
BlogNomic's ruleset is
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 12:52 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Having given a week's notice I make the changes detailed below. -Goethe
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
As no submissions were received this week, and only one last week, I
announce
my intent [no objections or support
--- On Thu, 19/8/10, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
From: Keba ag...@kebay.org
Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Hoisting one's own wormhole
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Date: Thursday, 19 August, 2010, 22:58
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Uh, yeah, the shuttle is in a wormhole right now. It
has been
--- On Fri, 20/8/10, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I recuse myself as judge from CFJ 2833, because I just
don't really
know how to deal with it.
Is it even possible to recuse yourself with a case immediately after judging?
Whether it is or not, you probably specified the wrong
--- On Fri, 20/8/10, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Barrel of Monkeys (AI = 1, II = 2)
Ugh, is Agora turning into BlogNomic?
I don't really see anything all that interesting in the proposed mechanics;
this would just be an exercise in grinding (as opposed to Space
--- On Sun, 22/8/10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Amend Rule 2284 (Fee-based actions) by appending the
following:
- A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number
of positions P on the list in an indicated direction (up
or down) for a charge
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.html?annotate=1
Probably broken on IE and/or in general.
Seems to work on the Firefox on this computer.
This should probably be made the default, if and when it's fully tested.
--
ais523
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I hope things are working now
I conclude on general principles that you're planning a timing scam, and am
wondering what it is.
--
ais523
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, without objection, I intend to interpret The Robot as
referring unambiguously to the (currently hypothetical) entity known
as The Robot that may be added to
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I'm reminded of (Peekee?) submitting a Protoposal (instead of
Proto-Proposal) and Kelly saying something like whatever the
hell that is; presumably should be handled by the Protomotor.
That's actually not a bad idea for an office.
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
CoE: the submitter was The Robot.
Nicknames are informal, and we can refer to you in any way that
unambiguously identifies you. (Which The Robot probably doesn't do.)
In particular,
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case, the entity with the name The Robot will be
coppro *at the time of the enaction of the rule*. Also:
A document referring to an entity by name refers to the
entity that had that name when the document first came to include
that
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
OIC.
Proposal: Mother says not to run on the concrete
(AI = 3, II = 1, co-author = omd, distributable via fee)
Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by replacing this
text:
If the Rules do not otherwise permit at least
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, omd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
-coppro
See CFJ 1520.
--- On Wed, 25/8/10, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I create a new Threat:
Name: The Robot
map symbol: R
H = 5
d = 2
e = 1
a = 2
s = 1
p = 1
I intend, without 2 objections from members of City, to rename City
to The Robot.
--
ais523
--- On Wed, 25/8/10, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:08 PM, omd
c.ome...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Alex Smith
callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
I intend, without 2 objections from members of
City, to rename City
to The Robot
It is of course illegal to judge CFJs during a Holiday (merry Christmas,
everyone!; besides, doesn't that violate R101?), but I thought people
might appreciate, you know, actually knowing the gamestate. I submit the
following as judge's arguments on the relevant CFJs, although I don't
assign any
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 16:13 -0400, omd wrote:
(a) a list of such intents could easily be found by performing a
search for intend (all but two players use either Gmail or Yahoo,
which are searchable, and I trust that G. and Murphy have some method
to search their email);
False assumption here,
; should such a
message really be acceptable for game actions?
--
Alex Smith
I just thought I'd send the CotC a reminder: you have less than a day
left to assign CFJs 3187 and 3188.
--
ais523
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 11:51 -0700, Klaus Herrmanns wrote:
Hi,
So what is currently going on in Agora? After some time spent browsing
recent mail archives and CFJs I'm not quite sure whether the game is
in a post-scam reorientation phase (still trying to figure out whether
the scam succeeded
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 23:51 -0500 or so, Tanner Swett wrote (five
times):
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I submit 12 promises to the Tree:
Text: {{{I transfer an ais523 trading card to the person who cashed this
promise.}}}
Cashing condition
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 00:01 -0500, Max Schutz wrote:
alright providing i understand this correctly I cash the promise bearing in
mind that i do not have a copy of the ais523 card if this is incorrect
please let me know as i am a new player
It's incorrect both because you sent it to the wrong
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 06:45 -0800, Klaus Herrmanns wrote:
I vote d).
I waited to see what the various CFJs would say.
Plus I note with interrest that players seem to rely on the rules
defined mechanisms enforcing trades (or not, as these mechanisms have
their quirks and gaps) rather
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:58 -0500, Tanner Swett wrote:
I think I agree that rule 754 is useless, except that I think this
part of it is very significant: A difference between two nonempty
spans of whitespace is inconsequential in all forms of communication
for all purposes. Maybe we should
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 00:45 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
I register. I become active.
On 28 January 2013 17:53, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
IDAI CHAMBER AUTHOR TITLE
7337 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Give those back
PRESENT
7338 3.0 Ordinary ais523
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:28 -0800, Wes Contreras wrote:
I hereby become a Player. Again.
I also contest the accuracy of the Herald's report issued on Jan 22,
2013, where a list of Fugitives is provided as the last section of
the report. These persons are not, in fact, Fugitives, as that term
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 14:48 -0800, woggle wrote:
Re: the online versions, comex's are out of date (AFAIK), but see
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/ .
Neat! We should update http://agoranomic.org with links to more current
information, really. (It was futureproofed in the way it was
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:33 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
This applies all the way to the top promise, Contrariwise. Caller, do
you have an argument against this? Regardless of what is going on or
how the message is built up, via promises or text messages, the function
of your scam depends upon
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 13:12 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend to make the following document Contest w/o 3 objections:
Hmm. If this is a statement about the lack of votes and an attempt to
fix it, a simpler fix might be just making it easier to find the
Promotor's posts. The way proposals are
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 18:25 -0500, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I think one thing that would really help would be timely Humiliating
Public Reminders.
I could issue those along with proposals each week; would anyone like me
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 23:56 -0400, omd wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
The issue at issue in this case is what the relevant public document is,
in the case of a proposal resolution. Based on the plain definitions in
the rules, the only conclusion
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 00:59 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
I object to making me inactive on the grounds that I have been busy with
work and dealing with some personal stuff
This is exactly the sort of circumstance that being inactive is meant
for.
I rarely deregister, but I become inactive due to
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 12:52 -0700, Wes Contreras wrote:
Can anyone explain why Second-Class Players exist? Because they
significantly complicate the Rules without any apparent benefit.
It occurred to us that perhaps we should ask before drafting Proposals
to remove them.
Basically they're a
It's quite rare for me to have dreams about nomic, but I did last night.
Basically what happened in the dream was that we'd enacted a rule
allowing players to temporarily ignore rules that they didn't like (the
dream wasn't clear on the details, but I think it was some sort of heavy
rate limit).
--- On Sun, 7/4/13, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I suggest we implement the form that was found in your dream: for
$currency, a player can suspend some part of a rule (for the whole
game or only as it relates to their actions?) for a while.
It sounds more interesting
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 01:49 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Decomposition (AI=2)
{{{
Append The basis of a Golem is that of its owner. to Rule
2360.
}}}
Given the number of recursive Golem loops we have at the moment, this
doesn't seem like a particularly well-defined definition.
--
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 01:19 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
I cause Rule 2380 to cause Rule 2361 to become a Slave Golem.
I CFJ { Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem. }
If Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem, I cause Rule 2380 to transfer it from the
LFD to me.
Arguments:
The only reason I can think of that
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 19:07 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Credit Where It's Due (AI=1.5)
{{{
Award the Patent Title 'Scamster' to ais523.
}}}
Hmm. Custom used to be that people only obtained the Scamster title by
means of an actual scam. However, the only time I scammed myself a
Patent
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 17:20 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote (nttpf):
I nominate ais523 for Promotor.
I'm randomly going several days at a time without Internet access at the
moment, and also kind-of busy in real life. So I don't think I have time
to take an office at the moment.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 01:31 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3305
== CFJ 3305 ==
Rule 2361 has been informed of CFJ 3301.
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 16:53 -0400, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
Gratuitous:
Yes, Rule 2380 could have changed itself, but that would have read
something like I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause Rule 2380 to
change the text of Rule 2380 to [...]. or I intend, with Agoran
Consent, to cause
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:36 -0400, omd wrote:
I intend, without objection, to change the Publicity of the fora
currently located at agora-busin...@agoranomic.org,
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org, and agora-discussion@agoranomic.org to
Foreign.
I think I know why, but I'd strongly recommend
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 12:38 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
COMIC BOOK GUY = WEEKLY TRADING CARD REPORT
My last attempt to do a general promise with respect to this turned out
hideously broken, but the general sentiment is still there: I'll
exchange an ais523 card for any card I don't currently have.
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 13:34 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I award Blue Ribbons (for timely judgement of inquiry cases)
to ais523 (CFJ 3308) and scshunt (CFJ 3307). -G.
I think I had one already, but thanks for keeping an eye out for ribbon
opportunities.
--
ais523
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 00:43 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
I destroy this Promise, because it can never be cashed.
How?
I destroy these promises, because they have nonexistent authors.
How?
I own them. Promises are assets, people! They're tradeable just like any
other currency, and destroyable too.
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 12:20 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I create 1035 promises titled berk in my possession. Text: I transfer
the specified trading card to the cashier, as long as the specified trading
card is one of
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 21:06 -0700, Wes Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:59 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Considering that Making My Eyes Bleed was originally adopted at
Class-6, and ehird was sentenced to TIME OUT for a Class-14 Crime, I
wouldn't put much stock in the
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 10:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
1. Toy Nomic has no players. It is not possible to become
a player of toy nomic.
2. The players of Toy Nomic can amend its Rules by
unanimous consent.
Doesn't this mean that it's platonically amending its rules in every
possible way,
701 - 800 of 1537 matches
Mail list logo
