Sorry - The voting on the below ended ~30 min ago (14 days after voting opened). Just plain ol' forgot.
I point a finger at myself for failure to issue a humiliating public reminder for the first decision. Voting resolution: 00000000000002-A: FOR: Jason, Falsifian. PRESENT: Murphy (Endorsed a non-voter) Voters: 3 Result: FAILED QUORUM 00000000000002-B. FOR: Falsifian. PRESENT: Jason, Murphy (Endorsed a non-voter) Voters: 3 Result: FAILED QUORUM On 3/15/2021 9:36 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Indictment Decision 00000000000002-A > Resolved: That Cuddlebeam be convicted (found guilty) for Oathbreaking > (pledge cited in evidence). > > Indictment Decision 00000000000002-B > Resolved: That the indictment fine of 3 blots, as issued by the Referee, > be accepted. > > I hereby initiate a referendum on each of the above Decisions. Each > decision has a voting method of AI-majority, with AI=1.5. The vote > collector is the Arbitor, the quorum is 4, valid options are FOR and > AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). > > Ordered pairs of votes for (A,B) above have the following meaning: > > (FOR, FOR) > Guilty, and 3 blots is an appropriate penalty. > > (FOR, AGAINST) > Guilty, but issue a different penalty (higher or lower). > > (AGAINST, FOR) > Not Guilty, but if found guilty by total votes, 3 blots is appropriate. > > (AGAINST, AGAINST) > Not Guilty, but if found guilty by total votes, issue a different penalty. > > > EVIDENCE > > On 2/8/21 6:07 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: >> I Point a Finger at Cuddlebeam for the crime of Oathbreaking for >> breaking the Oath made below. >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:04 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I pledge to give all of my VPs to Gaelan within 10 seconds of this >>> message being published, with an N of Oathbreaking of 0. > > > STATEMENT FOR THE PROSECUTION > (by the Referee) > >> I issue an Indictment against Cuddlebeam for the above violation, >> specifying a fine of 3 blots. >> >> I argue the Cuddlebeam ought to be convicted of this indictment because >> e has clearly violated Rule 2450 - e has even pointed eir finger at >> emself for doing so, meaning e has admitted the violation. In addition, >> this was clearly done in an attempt to earn a Justice card for having >> the most finger-pointings be resolved without Shenanigans, under Rule >> 2478. The fine of 3 blots is appropriate in order to discourage em from >> attempting such a stunt again, and to send a stern message to all >> Agorans that such simple attempts to illegally profit must not be >> tolerated. > > > STATEMENT FOR THE DEFENSE: > > On 3/8/2021 1:02 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: >> In my defense, I believe that the honorable Referee is being far too >> generous. I insist that my punishment must be at least 20 blots, with a >> further 10 blot penalty re-applied every month as community service so >> that I can help propel the stagnant Justice Card economy and make amends >> to the poor Agoran community. Only with a punishment of this magnitude - >> and dare I say that even this much is almost insufficient - can true >> Justice be imparted and the hearts of Agoran hearts all over the world >> be put at peace. >> >> I rest my case. > >
