On 4/7/24 02:25, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> Retitle R2642 (Gathering Stones) to "Stone Cost" and then amend R2642 to
> read in full:
>
> Stone Cost is a Stone switch with values of non-negative integers
> and a default of 10. Stone Cost is tracked by the Stonemason.
>
> Any player CAN pay a fee of X Spendies to transfer a specified stone
> to emself, where X is the current Stone Cost of the specified stone.
>
> When a stone is transferred, its Stone Cost is set to the default.
> At the beginning of every week, the Stone Cost for each stone is
> reduced by 1, to a minimum of 0.
>
> Repeal R2642 (Gathering Stones).
I CFJ: Rule 2642 has been repealed.
Evidence:
{
As quoted above, proposal 9079 attempted to retitle, amend, and then
repeal 2642. This was an authorial accident, as the repeal should've
been 2643.
What makes this an unclear case is that the repeal specifies a name for
the rule. Because of the re-titling, that name is incorrect. I kindly
request that the judge weigh in on whether specifying an incorrect rule
name has any effect on this change, and whether that incorrect rule name
being parenthetical matters.
}
I number this CFJ 4078. I assign CFJ 4078 to snail.
--
nix
Arbitor
