On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 01:05 +0000, Quazie wrote:
> I CFJ on the statement: I paid Gaelan 1 Shiney via QPS.
This is CFJ 3512. I assign it to Sprocklem.
> Arguments:
> 1 - QPS isn't a valid agency, as it contains 4 non-conjunction words.
> (Will
> is a verb, not a conjunction)
> 2 - Agencies allow people to be acted on behalf of, not acted as
> (though
> I'm unsure if there's a valid distinction there)
>
> Evidence:
> QPS's Supposed Text:
> {{{
> Quazie will Pay the Shinies (QPS)
> Head: Quazie
> Agents: All Players
> Powers:
> If Quazie makes a pledge in which e pledges 1 Shiny in return for
> an
> action or statement, the first player to fulfil the
> action/statement
> in the pledge can transfer a Shiny from Quazie to emself.
> }}}
>
> Agencies Rule text (in part):
> {{{
> Rule 2467/1 (Power=1)
> Agencies
>
> An Agency is a document empowering persons to act on behalf
> of
> another player. A player may establish an Agency With 24
> hours
> Notice and thereby become its Director by specifying the
> properties of the new Agency:
> a) A title, which must be exactly three words, not
> counting conjunctions, articles or prepositions.
> }}}
> Text of the pledge in question:
> {{{
> I pledge to pay Gaelan 1 shiny in thanks for not creating ~25^3 if
> he uses
> the powers within the QPS agency to pay emself said shiny.
> }}}
>
> Text of the supposed payment of a shiny
> {{{
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 20:25 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com>
> wrote:
> I act as Quazie via QPS to pay myself one shiny.
> }}}
>
> ---END CFJ---
> I retract my pledge quoted above as evidence.
>
> I pledge that if I didn't pay Gaelan 1 Shiny via QPS, that when the
> above
> CFJ resolves I will pay em 1 Shiny.
>
> I CoE on the latest Secretary report that now contains the payment in
> question, as it's not in question.
--
ais523
Arbitor
