[Sorry, I initially missed the second "linked" CFJ in the below message.]


> > I also call a linked CFJ  (yes, I know those don't exist) with Shinies
> > with the statement: "G: Overlord of Dunce is an Agency."

This is CFJ 3571.  I assign it to Nichdel.

Caller's arguments same as for 3570, below.


On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> > I use shinies to call a CFJ with the statement: "Ben Öyle Öneriyorum
> > is an agency"
> 
> 
> This is CFJ 3570.  I assign it to Nichdel.
> 
> 
> Caller's Arguments:
> 
> > Ben Öyle Öneriyorum was established in May with the powers of another
> > agency called GOD.  GOD's name was created and has always been listed
> > as G is Overlord of Dunce, which is patently invalid as a name ("is"
> > is a verb, so the agency's name is invalid, so the agency could not be
> > an agency).
> > 
> > I ratified the following document yesterday.
> > 
> > > {{There is an agency with the following text.
> > > "G: Overlord of Dunce  (GOD)
> > > Head: Quazie
> > > Agents:  G.
> > > Powers:   1 - The ability to give notice to establish Agencies with
> > >  Quazie as the Director or Head and G. as the only agent
> > >  2 - The ability to establish Agencies with Quazie as the Director or
> > >  Head and G. as the only agent".
> > > That agency was established by a message sent by Quazie, purporting to
> > > establish a message called "G is Overlord of Dunce", but the name of
> > > the agency is, and has been since its establishment, "G: Overlord of
> > > Dunce"}}
> > 
> > The question is this: what, if any effect does this ratification have,
> > and if it has the effect of making G: Overlord of Dunce an agency,
> > does it also ratify previous actions that purported to use "GOD" to do
> > things (the one thing it was used for was the establishment of BOO)
> > 
> > I also call a linked CFJ  (yes, I know those don't exist) with Shinies
> > with the statement: "G: Overlord of Dunce is an Agency."
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > From V.J. Rada
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to