[Sorry, I initially missed the second "linked" CFJ in the below message.]
> > I also call a linked CFJ (yes, I know those don't exist) with Shinies > > with the statement: "G: Overlord of Dunce is an Agency." This is CFJ 3571. I assign it to Nichdel. Caller's arguments same as for 3570, below. On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > > I use shinies to call a CFJ with the statement: "Ben Öyle Öneriyorum > > is an agency" > > > This is CFJ 3570. I assign it to Nichdel. > > > Caller's Arguments: > > > Ben Öyle Öneriyorum was established in May with the powers of another > > agency called GOD. GOD's name was created and has always been listed > > as G is Overlord of Dunce, which is patently invalid as a name ("is" > > is a verb, so the agency's name is invalid, so the agency could not be > > an agency). > > > > I ratified the following document yesterday. > > > > > {{There is an agency with the following text. > > > "G: Overlord of Dunce (GOD) > > > Head: Quazie > > > Agents: G. > > > Powers: 1 - The ability to give notice to establish Agencies with > > > Quazie as the Director or Head and G. as the only agent > > > 2 - The ability to establish Agencies with Quazie as the Director or > > > Head and G. as the only agent". > > > That agency was established by a message sent by Quazie, purporting to > > > establish a message called "G is Overlord of Dunce", but the name of > > > the agency is, and has been since its establishment, "G: Overlord of > > > Dunce"}} > > > > The question is this: what, if any effect does this ratification have, > > and if it has the effect of making G: Overlord of Dunce an agency, > > does it also ratify previous actions that purported to use "GOD" to do > > things (the one thing it was used for was the establishment of BOO) > > > > I also call a linked CFJ (yes, I know those don't exist) with Shinies > > with the statement: "G: Overlord of Dunce is an Agency." > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > > >