If I have not already numbered and assigned the below CFJ, I do as indicated below:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 13:51:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> To: Agora Official <agora-official@agoranomic.org> Subject: [Arbitor] CFJ 3584 assigned to o On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Telnaior wrote: > "Telnaior attempted to publish a Notice of Honour that was invalid solely > because she had already posted a valid Notice of Honour within the current > week.", and bar VJ Rada from the case. This is CFJ 3584. I assign it to o. Gratuitous Arguments by G: > Just a note, as Caller it's nice to provide, if not logical arguments, > a quick summary of events, e.g. "Telnaior attempted to publish one notice > of honour, but it only said 'notice of honour' in the Subject line and > not the message. If it succeeded anyway, the second attempt failed." Gratuitous Evidence by G.: First attempt: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-October/036517.html Second attempt: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-October/036518.html There was a lot of discussion of past precedents for subject lines: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2017-October/047233.html https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2017-October/047237.html
