The below CFJ is 3733, I assign it to G.
=============================== CFJ 3733 ===============================
On June 7, 2019, omd earned 5 Coins for publishing a
duty-fulfilling report.
==========================================================================
Caller: Falsifian
Judge: G.
==========================================================================
History:
Called by Falsifian: 08 Jun 2019 15:08:40
Assigned to G.: (as of this message)
==========================================================================
Caller's Arguments:
V.J. Rada said there's some precedent, but we haven't been able to
find it. omd found CFJ 3551, which isn't quite the same situation: in
it, H. Judge o decided that publishing a revision to a report in
response to a claim of error fulfills a duty for the purpose of the
Rewards rule.
Ignoring precedent, I think it's TRUE. R2143 defines "official duty
for an office", but I don't see "duty" defined in the rules. The first
definition in Wiktionary is "That which one is morally or legally
obligated to do". omd was both legally (in the sense that the rules
required em) and morally (in the sense that one should do what one
promises) obligated to publish that report.
Caller's Evidence:
omd wrote:
> I pledge to publish a report, at least once in the current week, about
> whether or not I am wearing a hat.
>
> I publish the following report:
> {
> I am not wearing a hat, although my bicycle helmet is on the desk in
> front of me.
> }
>
> I earn 5 Coins for publishing a duty-fulfilling report.
==========================================================================
