The below CFJ is 3911. I assign it to Murphy.
status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3911
=============================== CFJ 3911 ===============================
For the purposes of R2553, CFJ 3907 is about the effectiveness,
possibility, or legality of a change in the gamestate.
==========================================================================
Caller: G.
Barred: Gaelan
Judge:
==========================================================================
History:
Called by G.: 05 Jun 2021 21:58:39
Assigned to Murphy: [now]
==========================================================================
Caller's Evidence:
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3907
Caller's Arguments:
Gaelan wrote:
> The fact that I violated the rules has a direct impact on the
> effectiveness, legality, etc of our various criminal-justice
> mechanisms, so I'd argue TRUE. If necessary, I would just call
> another CFJ along the lines of "it's possible to give me blots
> for violating that pledge".
That answer's trivial - it's not possible, because you can't actually be
blotted for an indeterminate crime:
Rule 2531
> Any attempt to levy a fine pursuant to the imposition of the Cold
> Hand of Justice is INEFFECTIVE if:
> (1) it attempts to levy a fine on a person when that person
> can't be established by a preponderance of the evidence to
> have committed the action or inaction for which the fine was
> levied;
This protection makes it irrelevant.
==========================================================================
