Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3018
============================== CFJ 3018 ==============================
In the message quoted in the Evidence whose author was scshunt,
the author violated Rule 2205 and/or 2152 by not carefully
weighing the implications of failing to explicitly label his
arguments and/or evidence
========================================================================
Caller: Bucky
Barred: Tanner L. Swett
Judge: scshunt
Judgement: FALSE
========================================================================
History:
Called by Bucky: 03 May 2011 05:13:46 GMT
Assigned to scshunt: 15 May 2011 23:29:57 GMT
Judged FALSE by scshunt: 15 May 2011 23:45:31 GMT
========================================================================
Caller's Arguments:
The quoted message contains what appears to be a valid attempt to initiate a
CfJ. It does not contain an explicit evidence label, as mandated by rule
2205. Additionally, it appears that the reason why the evidence was not
labelled was carelessness on the part of the sender. Further evidence of a
hastily-constructed message is supplied by the lack of arguments even though
the case's judge would likely appreciate some hint regarding what rule he
suspects was broken.
Finally, supposing he had carefully considered the implications of not
labeling his evidence, he would have realized the rather minimal opportunity
cost of doing so.
(It's also possible but unlikely that he intended the quoted message to be
his arguments. If that is the case then all the above arguments still
apply.
The mere existence of this line of argument is additional support for the
CfJ'd statement.)
========================================================================
Caller's Evidence:
--- On Mon, 5/2/11, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> From: Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
> Subject: Re: BUS: RAD
> To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
> Date: Monday, May 2, 2011, 4:18 PM
> On 11-05-02 02:00 PM, Tanner Swett
> wrote:
> > I sit. I nominate myself.
> >
> > (Please do not call a CFJ on the statement "In the
> message quoted,
> > Tanner L. Swett received and accepted a nomination for
> an office".)
> >
> > —Tanner L. Swett
>
> I call a CFJ on the statement "In the message quoted,
> Tanner L. Swett
> violated a rule."
>
> -scshunt
>
Rule 2152 section 7:
" SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform
the described action, the full implications of failing to
perform it should (in the ordinary-language sense) be
understood and carefully weighed."
Rule 2205:
" Each of the following participants in a judicial case SHOULD
present such arguments and/or evidence (explicitly labeled)
relevant to that case as e is reasonably able to collect"
========================================================================
