status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3554
(This document is informational only and contains no game actions).
============================== CFJ 3554 ==============================
When nichdel resolved proposal 7867, he neither published a duty-
fulfilling report nor resolved an Agoran Decision, for the
purposes of the rule "Rewards."
========================================================================
Caller: o
Judge: ais523
Judgement: TRUE
========================================================================
History:
Called by o: 30 Jul 2017
Assigned to ais523: 01 Aug 2017
Judged TRUE by ais523: 24 Aug 2017
========================================================================
Caller's Arguments:
Resolving proposal 7867 occurred before the rule was enacted, and
therefore is not governed by the rules changes in that proposal.
(This is more of a sanity-check CFJ than anything. I don???t care
_what_ the outcome is, only that we all agree on which outcome
should apply.)
========================================================================
Judge's Arguments:
I renumber this CFJ 3554 (it was a duplicate number), and judge it
TRUE. "Meeting a Reward Condition" is something that happens actively,
at a particular point in time. You can't meet a Reward Condition that
doesn't exist, so the condition can only be met if it exists at the
time. This means that you can't claim a reward for something that's now
rewardable, if it wasn't rewardable when it happened, even if it
happened in the last 24 hours.
========================================================================
