status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3880 (This document is informational only and contains no game actions).
=============================== CFJ 3880 =============================== This is a CFJ. ========================================================================== Caller: Trigon Judge: ATMunn Judgement: TRUE ========================================================================== History: Called by Trigon: 25 Aug 2020 20:29:58 Assigned to ATMunn: 30 Aug 2020 18:41:29 Judged TRUE by ATMunn: 07 Sep 2020 00:47:07 ========================================================================== Alleged calling message: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-August/044696.html Arbitor's Note: If a judge finds that eir assigned CFJ is not a CFJ, common practice is to leave it in the archives with its initial ID number (along with the not- judgement) and not reassign the ID#, so it can be used as a handy reference for any follow-up CFJs that might be called on the matter. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Judge ATMunn's Arguments: The only relevant piece of the rules here is the first paragraph of Rule 991: Any person (the initiator) can initiate a Call for Judgement (CFJ, syn. Judicial Case), specifying a statement to be inquired into by announcement. It seems reasonable to interpret the statement of "This is a CFJ" as meaning "I initiate a CFJ with the statement 'This is a CFJ'". We allow the format "CFJ: blah", and this is not that far off from that. I judge CFJ 3880 TRUE. ==========================================================================