PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW

If a single proposal with title "It's only one point" exists in the
proposal pool, I withdraw it.

If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9HKa1L9oXahSVRC-HpC0kVYnHdERgUirGZ4-JGUQE/edit?usp=sharing

I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote
collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 3, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
conditional votes).


ID      Author(s)               AI    Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8805~  Jason                    1.0   Removal of vote points v2

8806-  Jason                    1.0   Filler
8810 (all ~ (Ordinary)) (yes these are 5 identical proposals)

8812~   secretsnail             3.0   Quorum for all
8813~   secretsnail             3.0   Spam Blocker
8814~   Jason                   3.0   Effective activity



The proposal pool contains the following proposals (probably):

ID      Author(s)               AI    Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8815~   ais523                  3.0   Proposal terminology fix
8816~   secretsnail             3.05  No Duplication Allowed
8817~   secretsnail             3.05  No Duplication Allowed



Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal.
        <ID>! : Sponsored, Democratic proposal.
        <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal.
        <ID>& : Sponsored, Ordinary proposal.

The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8805
Title: Removal of vote points v2
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Jason
Co-author(s):

Amend Rule 2657 by, as a single amendment, removing all list items that
contain the text "AGAINST" or "FOR".

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8806-8810 (5 identical proposals)
Title: Filler
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Jason
Co-author(s):

This proposal has no effect.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8812
Title: Quorum for all
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: secretsnail
Co-author(s):

Amend Rule 879 (Quorum) by replacing "2/3 of the number of voters on the
referendum that had been most recently resolved" with "2/3 of the number of
voters on the Agoran decision that had been most recently resolved".
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8813
Title: Spam Blocker
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: secretsnail
Co-authors:


Amend Rule 2350 (Proposals) by replacing "A player CAN create a proposal by
announcement" with "Five times per week, each player CAN create a proposal
by announcement".

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8814
Title: Effective activity
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Jason
Co-authors:


Set the power of Rule 2646 (Activity) to 3.

[Rule 2646 cannot authorize deregistration at power 1 because
Citizenship is secured at power 3.]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8815
Title: Proposal terminology fix
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: ais523
Co-authors:


Amend rule 2350 by changing "A player CAN create a proposal" to "A
player CAN create (syn. submit) a proposal".


Amend rule 2350 by changing "The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal
is the person who submitted it." to "The author (syn. proposer) of a
proposal is the person who created it.".

[Ensures that "creating" and "submitting" a proposal are synonyms – the
current rules aren't clear enough on this issue.]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8816
Title: No Duplication Allowed
Adoption index: 3.05
Author: secretsnail
Co-author(s):


Enact a new rule with power 3.05, title "No Duplication Allowed", and the
following text:

{
An entity CANNOT be created if it already exists.
}

[This would codify the invisible requirement that presumably already
exists. Thus creating it again?]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8817
Title: No Duplication Allowed
Adoption index: 3.05
Author: secretsnail
Co-author(s):


Enact a new rule with power 3.05, title "No Duplication Allowed", and the
following text:

{
An entity CANNOT be created if it already exists.
}

[This would codify the invisible requirement that presumably already
exists. Thus creating it again?]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
--
secretsnail

Reply via email to