In Proposal 8904:
> Amend Rule 2468 ("The Royal Parade") by replacing "Jason" with "Janet".
No such rule exists.
In Proposal 8906:
> Amend Rule 2643 ("Collecting Stones") by prepending the following paragraph:
>
> {
>
> A stone is immune if and only if it is defined as such by the rules of
> power not less than 2.
>
> A stone is immune if it is owned by Agora. A stone is immune if it has
> been granted immunity since the last collection notice. The granting of
> immunity is secured.
>
> }
The text is two paragraphs, not one paragraph. I consider this ambiguous
and have not applied this in the latest ruleset. I expect this to be
challenged.
In Proposal 8907:
> Amend Rule 2645 ("The Stones") by replacing "If this stone is not owned
> by Agora, it cannot otherwise be transferred, other rules
> notwithstanding." with "If this stone is not owned by Agora, a player
> CANNOT otherwise transfer it, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.".
The text to replace does not exist (removed by P8900).
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
