AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Unconditional simulation

2009-11-17 Thread Isobel Clark
Nick The simplest way would be to do a aussian simulation and then do a rank transfrom on the results, I think. Isobel http://www.kriging.com --- On Tue, 17/11/09, Nick Hamm n...@hamm.org wrote: From: Nick Hamm n...@hamm.org Subject: AI-GEOSTATS: Unconditional simulation To:

AI-GEOSTATS: Random number seed and unconditional simulation

2009-11-17 Thread Nick Hamm
Dear all I have a question about the random number seeding in R. I want to simulate several random fields. Each RF should have zero nugget, the same sill but a different range (e.g., 100x100, range: 1 - 30). Let's stick with the Gaussian case for now. I use the following code

Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Unconditional simulation

2009-11-17 Thread seba
Hi Nick One way is to use simulated annealing (see gslib) putting as objective function your desired variogram and histogram. (but I guess that by means of some data transformation you can do that with a simple sequential gaussian simulation approach) Bye Sebas At 10.06 17/11/2009, Nick Hamm

Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Random number seed and unconditional simulation

2009-11-17 Thread Anatoly Saveliev
Nick Hamm : Dear all I have a question about the random number seeding in R. Note that, for each simulation, I use the same random number seed. This results in a series of images that look like they have the same starting point (sorry, this is not very technical), but with progressively

AI-GEOSTATS: typos

2009-11-17 Thread Anatoly Saveliev
typos: it was phi, not sigma ... you'll get change at some phi Anatoly Saveliev + + To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu + To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT SEND

Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Unconditional simulation

2009-11-17 Thread Pierre Goovaerts
well Isobel explained how to go from Gaussian to uniform... On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Anatoly Saveliev s...@ksu.ru wrote: Pierre Goovaerts : For once, I agree with Isobel. sGs is the way to go... sGs - Gaussian by definition; he wants uniform :-) Anatoly Saveliev Pierre On