RE: [ai-geostats] Geostats Scam?

2006-02-07 Thread Paul Walline
machnife, This has been discussed. You can search the archives to read the discussion. My best guess is that people posting regularly on AI-Geostats do not agree that Geostatistics is a scam :-). You can also read what A. Journel had to say about the argument in material Merks has posted on his web

RE: [ai-geostats] Geostats Scam?

2006-02-07 Thread Collier, Perry \(TS\)
Here we go again list! Welcome to the world of Jan Merks, "Mach" Perry Collier Senior Geologist Rio Tinto Technical Services Phone: +61 7 3327 7676 Mobile: 0408 015 837 -Original Message- From: Mach Nife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 8 February 2006 4:59 AM To: ai-g

RE: [ai-geostats] Geostats Scam?

2006-02-08 Thread Gregoire Dubois
icial position of the European Commission." -Original Message- From: Collier, Perry (TS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 February 2006 23:21 To: ai-geostats@unil.ch Subject: RE: [ai-geostats] Geostats Scam? Here we go again list! Welcome to the world of Jan Merks, "Mach&

Re: [ai-geostats] Geostats Scam?

2006-02-08 Thread Stephen Henley
Hi Mach - Jan Merks isn't the only one who has questioned the fundamentals of geostatistics. You might also like to look at the work of Robert F. Shurtz. Perhaps the most interesting is a slim volume published by the Mining & Metallurgical Society of America, "A Geostatistical Monograph" (in 1

Re: [ai-geostats] Geostats Scam?

2006-02-12 Thread Stephen Henley
One of the foundation stones of geostatistics is the assumption that there is a spatial semivariogram function which is invariant under spatial translation. In many geological situations of interest (I might even say 'most'), this assumption is patently false. For example, in a typical hydrothe